Table 1 Comparison of tourism multi-criteria research approaches Approach Evaluation Profiling Prediction Trust [16] HRS MC SVR [12] TA MC – [28] TA SC ANFIS [11] TA SC k-means [8] TA SC SVD Our proposal TA & E SC & MC k-NN (checkmark ).
The judges evaluated the projects using the following criteria: research, creativity, quality (i.e., construction, tech pack [garment measurements], and fitting), presentation (i.e., storyboard and oral presentation), and readiness for production.
Further 38.6% declared contributions exclusively to the first two ICMJE criteria (research and writing).
The black and white flyer included the study purpose, location, criteria, research procedures, and contact information.
The workgroup also recommended new diagnosis criteria: research criteria, which incorporated the biomarker based on imaging or cerebrospinal fluid measures into the core clinical criteria [ 47].
We have found 61 original papers from 1998 to 2009 (4191 patients) according to our criteria research.
More than a third (38.6%) satisfied the first two ICMJE criteria (research and writing), while the rest declared a single ICMJE contribution, either to research execution (31.8%) or writing (9.4%) (Table 1).
Methodological aspects of the study are systematic recruitment and randomization, explicit inclusion and exclusion criteria, research assessors and coders blinded to treatment allocation, advanced statistical analysis, manualized treatment protocols and assessments of treatment adherence and integrity.
Allahverdi et al. (2008) implied that almost no multi-criteria researches are available according to real situations.
The second information criterion of research (blue boxplots) included current studies, study results, and registry.
