Significant relations were found between the parameters of the ramp-and-hold lip force task and target force level, including the peak rate of force change (dF/dtmax), peak force, and the criterion percentage of force within ±5% of target during the contraction hold phase.
The Nash Sutcliffe model efficiency criterion, percentage error in volume, the percentage error in peak, and net difference of observed and simulated time to peak which were used for performance evaluation, have been found to range from 74.2 to 95.1%, 2.9 to 20.9%, 0.1 to 20.8% and −1 to 3 h, respectively, indicating a good performance of the GGIUH model for prediction of runoff hydrograph.
Yet, the primary outcome criterion (percentage of injections taken) and secondary outcomes, with the exceptions of global clinical improvement which is rated by clinicians and subjective quality of life and treatment satisfaction which is rated by patients, can be obtained objectively and are taken from the medical records, and should therefore not be influenced by lack of masking.
To provide an empirical evaluation of the success criterion percentages of patients who fulfilled a certain number of subcriteria (3, 4, 5) are presented.
Table 2 Assessment rubric for "Health-Promoting University" project Assessment criteria Percentage Score 5.0 4.0 3.0 2.0 1.0 Describes and analyzes the case-problem using the principles of the social determinants of health model.
15 % Table 3 Assessment rubric "Learning Disabilities" project Assessment criteria Percentage Score 5.0 4.0 3.0 2.0 1.0 Describes the problem appropriately, justifies its relevance and sets clear goals.
Table 9 Criteria used in AHP Criteria Percentage Efficiency 35 % in-operation time 10 In-system time 15 Material movement (distance traveled) 10 Productivity 55 % unit produced 20 Unit per worker per day 20 Total productive time 15 Resource utilization 10 Total 100 Open image in new window Fig. 3 AHP result of simulated facility layouts (redesigned).
The competition, which challenges student leaders to build the largest and most impactful ally initiatives they can over the school year, evaluates their success on three criteria: percentage of the student body participating, number of ally engagement events or campaigns executed, and outcomes of a campus inclusion survey that measures LGBT awareness and campus climate.
Table 4 shows the total number of cases of Down's syndrome (from the 12 full EUROCAT registries meeting the inclusion criteria), percentage prenatally diagnosed, median gestation at diagnosis and the number and percentage resulting in termination of pregnancy.
Descriptive statistics on standards of care are calculated by the percentage of clinics meeting the structure criteria, percentage of subjects enrolled, attendance and completion of the programme, receiving criterion process of intervention, investigations and referral per protocol and percentage of subjects achieving the criterion outcomes in each audit cycle.
To enhance comparability, a blinded researcher (NHC) stratified and matched participating clusters according to the following criteria: percentage of patients in practice from ethnic minorities, type of practice (single handed, one or more partner practice, or healthcare centre), practice location (urban/rural), age of general practitioner, and sex of general practitioner.
