criterion for reasoning

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "criterion for reasoning" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing standards or principles that guide logical thinking or decision-making processes. Example: "In philosophical debates, establishing a clear criterion for reasoning is essential to ensure that arguments are evaluated fairly."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

Encyclopedias

News & Media

Wiki

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

1 human-written examples

What makes this view "Kantian" is that there is ultimately one criterion for reasoning on practical matters, which is the Categorical Imperative.

SEP

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

59 human-written examples

If such a sequence is aimed at the solution of a specific problem and fulfills the criteria for reasoning, it is called directed thinking.

Encyclopedia Britannica

In both cases one finds an attempt to identify general criteria for good reasoning and argument schemes that incorporate specific forms of reasoning.

SEP

Analogical inferences emerge as a consequence of identifying the 'best mapping.' In terms of criteria for analogical reasoning, there are two main ideas.

SEP

While the field of informal logic still recognizes key fallacies (e.g., equivocation and false dilemma) in pedagogical and theoretical discussion, the problems with fallacy theory have convinced many that theories of informal logic should focus, not on fallacies, but on general criteria for good reasoning (premise acceptability and relevance, etc).

SEP

Most recent analyses (both philosophical and computational) have been directed towards elucidating general criteria and procedures, rather than formal rules, for reasoning by analogy.

SEP

Jones et al. (2007), Reiss (2011) and Yap (2014) stressed the three indicators as important criteria for evaluating ethical reasoning.

Asia-Pacific Science Education

A rather different a priori strategy, proposed by Bartha (2010), limits the scope of justification to analogical arguments that satisfy tentative criteria for 'good' analogical reasoning.

SEP

It doesn't assist Bush with his reasoning; it substitutes for reasoning.

The New Yorker

PDL was conceived primarily for reasoning about programs.

SEP

The left and right hemispheres are for reasoning and creativity.

WikiHow

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "criterion for reasoning", ensure the context clearly defines what specific type of reasoning is being evaluated (e.g. ethical, logical, scientific).

Common error

Avoid applying "criterion for reasoning" without specifying the domain or context. Vague criteria can lead to subjective and inconsistent evaluations. Always provide context to ensure clarity.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "criterion for reasoning" functions as a noun phrase that identifies a specific standard or principle used to evaluate the quality of logical thought. As Ludwig AI confirms, the phrase is usable in written English, particularly when discussing standards that guide decision-making.

Expression frequency: Rare

Frequent in

Science

42%

News & Media

25%

Encyclopedias

17%

Less common in

Wiki

8%

Formal & Business

8%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "criterion for reasoning" serves as a benchmark for assessing the quality of logical thought. Ludwig AI confirms its proper usage in written English. Although relatively rare, this phrase finds relevance across diverse fields, but it is most common in scientific, encyclopedic and media contexts. For alternative expressions, consider "basis for reasoning" or "standard for rational thought". When using "criterion for reasoning", clearly define the specific context to avoid vagueness and ensure consistent application.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

basis for reasoning

Replaces "criterion" with "basis", emphasizing the underlying foundation for logical thought.

standard for rational thought

Substitutes "criterion" with "standard" and "reasoning" with "rational thought", offering a more formal tone.

benchmark for logical thinking

Uses "benchmark" instead of "criterion", highlighting a point of reference for assessing logical processes.

measure for sound judgment

Replaces "reasoning" with "sound judgment", shifting the focus to the quality of decision-making.

yardstick for coherent thought

Employs "yardstick" as a metaphor for measurement, referring to the consistency and clarity of thought.

principle guiding thought processes

Focuses on the guiding aspect of a criterion, highlighting its role in shaping thought.

rule for logical inference

Specifies the type of reasoning as "logical inference", making the phrase more precise.

guideline for rational analysis

Replaces "criterion" with "guideline", suggesting a less strict and more flexible approach to analysis.

metric for intellectual evaluation

Uses "metric" to indicate a quantitative measure used in evaluating intellectual processes.

touchstone for cognitive processing

Employs "touchstone" to convey a test of genuineness for cognitive functions.

FAQs

How can I use "criterion for reasoning" in a sentence?

You can use "criterion for reasoning" to discuss the standards used to judge the quality of thinking, such as "Premise acceptability and relevance are general "criteria for good reasoning"".

What is a synonym for "criterion for reasoning"?

Alternatives to "criterion for reasoning" include "basis for reasoning", "standard for rational thought", or "benchmark for logical thinking", depending on the context.

What makes a good "criterion for reasoning"?

A good "criterion for reasoning" should be clear, relevant, and applicable to the specific type of reasoning being assessed. It should also be consistently applied to ensure fair and objective evaluations.

How does "criterion for reasoning" relate to critical thinking?

"Criterion for reasoning" provides the framework for evaluating arguments and evidence, which is a core component of critical thinking. It helps to identify flaws in logic and biases in thought processes.