Sentence examples for criterion for knowledge from inspiring English sources

Plainly, the doctrine presupposes a stringent criterion for knowledge, at least as demanding as the test for techne.

The first prong is that no simple criterion for knowledge (or reliable belief or justified belief) has ever been devised that succeeds in ruling out knowledge of the abstract without thereby ruling out types of knowledge most naturalists would accept (Steiner 1975).

Ideally, rational evaluation of objective evidence and scientific scrutiny of such evaluation should be the criterion for knowledge, not simple authority of the interpreter.

We applied the proposed method to obtain the weights of criteria for knowledge management evaluation by perceptual computing.

(By contrast, methodism begins with criteria for knowledge and justification and then attempts to ascertain whether, on these criteria, we actually have any knowledge or justified beliefs).

But of Plato's three criteria for knowledge, justified, true, belief, (Gettier 1963, Hendricks 2005), epistemic logic really works with only two of them.

Doing so requires overcoming participatory, epistemological and ontological challenges, including different communicative forms, diverging criteria for knowledge validation, and conflicting views of nature.

It may be true, as Plantinga's Reformed epistemology emphasises, that if God exists such experiences meet externalist criteria for knowledge, even though the truth of the beliefs concerned remains open to reflective 'internalist' doubt.

The general aims that integrate features of argumentation are focused on empowering students to talk and to write science as well as on supporting their enculturation into science communities and their acquisition of epistemic criteria for knowledge evaluation.

The starting set of criteria for knowledge evaluation was based on nine theoretical properties of information and knowledge (such as robustness or fitness for purpose), each with a 1-5 scale of evaluation, with a description of requirements for each score.

In terms of the innovation system matrix categories, the contention that no consensus exists about criteria for knowledge quality is an infrastructural problem as it gives information about how the knowledge infrastructure is organised.