criterion for comparison

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "criterion for comparison" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing the standards or benchmarks used to evaluate or assess different items, options, or subjects against each other. Example: "When evaluating the effectiveness of various marketing strategies, the criterion for comparison should include cost, reach, and engagement metrics."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

Formal & Business

News & Media

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

7 human-written examples

Reliability analysis provides a rational criterion for comparison of the likely consequences of decisions taken under uncertainty.

International Journal of Advanced Structural Engineering

In this work, a consistent criterion for comparison of thermodynamic equilibrium data has been developed and applied to a list of potential solvents.

Chemical Engineering Research and Design

Being a single score, the tree score provides a criterion for comparison of hierarchical algorithms to algorithms that are nonhierarchical in nature.

Plosone

This scale will be used as an external criterion for comparison with changes in scores of other outcomes [ 58].

BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders

We use the area under curve (AUC) value of the ROC curve as the criterion for comparison, which has been used in previous work [ 20].

BMC Genomics

Scales of this kind are frequently used as an external criterion for comparison with changes in scores of other outcomes [ 73].

BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

53 human-written examples

The WOMAC provided a criterion specific comparison for the lower limb while the EQ-5D-3 L enabled a clarification and criterion standard for comparison of the participants' health status.

Health and Quality of Life Outcomes

The most widely recognized criterion for comparisons of anatomical structures is homology.

Bioinformatics

In addition, a balanced false discovery rate (FDR) can be used as a criterion for comparisons of methods, computed as FDR = FP a / FP a + TP) where FP a accounts for imbalanced data by dividing FP by the ratio between the negative and positive synthetic datasets, calculated as FP a = FP/ π0, π0 = (FP + TN / TP + FN).

eLife

(Criteria for comparison include lyrics, melody, rhythms, tonality, pitch, instrumentation, etc).

The New York Times

As criteria for comparison we use the maximal temperature achieved and the robustness of solution.

Chemical Engineering Science

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using the phrase "criterion for comparison", ensure that the specific criteria are clearly defined and relevant to the context. This clarity enhances the validity and usefulness of any comparative analysis.

Common error

Avoid assuming that the "criterion for comparison" is universally understood. Always explicitly state the criteria to prevent misunderstandings and ensure consistent evaluation.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "criterion for comparison" functions as a noun phrase acting as a subject complement or within a prepositional phrase, defining a standard used to evaluate or judge different entities. Ludwig AI confirms its usability in written English.

Expression frequency: Uncommon

Frequent in

Science

75%

Formal & Business

15%

News & Media

10%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "criterion for comparison" is a phrase used to denote a standard by which different entities are evaluated. Ludwig AI confirms that the phrase is grammatically sound and suitable for use in written English. Its usage is most frequent in scientific and formal contexts, demanding a clear and well-defined criterion to ensure objective assessment. While alternatives such as "basis for evaluation" or "standard for assessment" exist, the original phrase is a precise and effective way to convey the concept. Remember to explicitly define the criteria used to avoid ambiguity. This phrase, although not extremely common, holds significant importance when seeking clarity and rigor in comparative analyses.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

ground for comparison

Emphasizes the fundamental reason or basis on which the comparison is made.

point of reference for comparison

Adds 'point of reference' to clarify the function of the criterion.

basis for evaluation

Focuses on evaluation rather than a broader comparison.

standard for assessment

Emphasizes assessment as the method of comparison.

measure for evaluating

Uses 'measure' as a synonym for criterion and 'evaluating' instead of 'comparison'.

benchmark for analysis

Highlights analysis as the method of comparison, implying a detailed examination.

frame of reference for evaluation

Indicates a conceptual lens through which things are evaluated, adding a theoretical dimension.

yardstick for measuring

Uses a more figurative term ('yardstick') and specifies measuring as the activity.

metric for contrasting

Replaces 'criterion' with 'metric' and 'comparison' with 'contrasting', focusing on differences.

principle for comparative analysis

Focuses on analysis, but highlights the guiding principle behind it.

FAQs

How can I use "criterion for comparison" in a sentence?

The phrase "criterion for comparison" is used to indicate a standard or principle by which different things are evaluated. For example: "The primary "basis for comparison" was the overall cost-effectiveness of each solution."

What is a good alternative to "criterion for comparison"?

Alternatives to "criterion for comparison" include "basis for evaluation", "standard for assessment", or "benchmark for analysis". The best choice depends on the specific context.

Is it better to say "criteria for comparison" or "criterion for comparison"?

"Criterion" is singular, while "criteria" is plural. Use "criterion for comparison" when referring to a single standard. Use "criteria for comparison" when referring to multiple standards.

What's the difference between "criterion for comparison" and "metric for comparison"?

While both terms refer to standards of evaluation, a "criterion for comparison" is a general principle or requirement. A "metric for comparison", on the other hand, is a specific quantifiable measure used in the assessment.