Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
Exact(5)
"A generally accepted criterion for authorship is that authors must take responsibility for the integrity of the paper," says the journal's editor, Peter Wright, a biophysicist at the Scripps Research Institute in San Diego, California.
The ICMJE has recently proposed a new criterion for authorship.
All of the listed authors contributed to the presented study and meet the criterion for authorship.
Consequently, this makes the final approval a procedural requirement, and not necessarily a criterion for authorship contribution.
The most important change was the addition of a new criterion for authorship to emphasize each author's responsibility to stand by the integrity of the entire work and reads: "Agreement to be accountable for all aspects of the work in ensuring that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are appropriately investigated and resolved".
Similar(55)
Both authors conceived the work and met the criteria for authorship stated in the Uniform Requirements Submitted to Biomedical Journals.
In addition, YJBM requires that all authors certify that they meet the criteria for authorship, as described by the ICMJE Recomendations.
Students are introduced to basic issues in credit and responsibility in science including criteria for authorship, conflict of interest, accountability of authors and reviewers, and data integrity.
In our survey of hyperprolific authors, most of them admitted that, in many of their papers, they did not meet the traditional Vancouver criteria for authorship [recommendations for conducting, reporting, editing, and publishing scholarly work in medical journals that is drafted by the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors].
The authors met the criteria for authorship as recommended by the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors.
All associated authors are listed within the manuscript, and no other person satisfied the criteria for authorship.
More suggestions(16)
requirements for authorship
standards for authorship
guidelines for authorship
criteria for authorship
criterion for elevation
criterion for success
criterion for funding
criterion for review
criterion for collection
criterion for brain
criterion for inclusion
criterion for objection
criterion for employment
criterion for ownership
criterion for horror
criterion for conversion
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com