Used and loved by millions
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com
criterion for analysis
Grammar usage guide and real-world examplesUSAGE SUMMARY
The phrase "criterion for analysis" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing the standards or principles used to evaluate or assess something in a particular context. Example: "The criterion for analysis in this study includes factors such as reliability, validity, and relevance."
✓ Grammatically correct
Science
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Human-verified examples from authoritative sources
Exact Expressions
4 human-written examples
So, for a given PAPR0 (dB), the percentage of combinations that guarantee (PAPR > PAPR0) is a meaningful criterion for analysis.
However, only 14 upstream passages carried out by 10 fish on 9 different dates lasted less than one minute, which was the selection criterion for analysis.
Science
The three fourth level scores were calculated only for those groups of consecutive nucleotides meeting the following criterion for analysis: every nucleotide in the group having an engaged score of at least 0.1.
Science
Reversible curing of prion phenotype is an important genetic criterion for analysis of prion proteins in yeast.
Science
Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources
Similar Expressions
56 human-written examples
Of these, 67 studies met inclusion criteria for analysis.
Science
For this the tool offers criteria for analysis and guidelines for the development of solutions.
Science
The authors systematically reviewed 1,888 studies and found eight that fitted their criteria for analysis.
News & Media
In sum, 86 samples (N = 15,616) fulfilled selection criteria for analysis.
Science
Nineteen manuscripts encompassing 3506 total knee arthroplasty met criteria for analysis (average follow-up, 8.6 years).
Science
Through employing the Lyapunov stability theory, the feasibility criteria for analysis of robust disturbance attenuation performance are derived first.
The criteria for analysis are the characteristics of the learning system, the effectiveness based on students' performance; the skill developed using the learning system, and students' feedback.
Expert writing Tips
Best practice
Always link the "criterion for analysis" to the overall research question or objective to ensure a clear and logical connection in your argumentation.
Common error
Don't define the "criterion for analysis" too broadly; instead, use specific and well-defined standards to prevent ambiguity in your analytical process. A vague criterion makes results subjective and hard to reproduce.
Source & Trust
82%
Authority and reliability
4.3/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested
Linguistic Context
The phrase "criterion for analysis" functions as a noun phrase that specifies a standard or principle used to evaluate something. As noted by Ludwig, it serves to define the basis upon which an assessment is made.
Frequent in
Science
100%
Less common in
News & Media
0%
Formal & Business
0%
Academia
0%
Ludwig's WRAP-UP
The phrase "criterion for analysis" is a grammatically sound term commonly used to denote the standards applied in an evaluation process. Ludwig AI confirms its correctness. Predominantly found in scientific and academic contexts, the phrase ensures objectivity and consistency. When using "criterion for analysis", it's crucial to maintain specificity and avoid vagueness for a more robust analytical outcome. Alternatives such as "analytical standard" and "basis for assessment" can be used to provide variety while maintaining clarity.
More alternative expressions(6)
Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:
analytical standard
Focuses on the standard used specifically in an analytical process.
basis for assessment
Emphasizes the foundation upon which an assessment is made.
yardstick for evaluation
Uses a metaphor to describe a measure used for judging something.
benchmark for scrutiny
Implies a high standard against which something is carefully examined.
metric for examination
Highlights the quantitative aspect of the evaluation process.
parameters for investigation
Focuses on the boundaries and conditions within which an investigation is conducted.
principle for appraisal
Stresses the underlying principle guiding the appraisal.
framework for evaluation
Highlights the structured approach used to evaluate.
foundation for assessment
Highlights the basics upon which the assessment is based.
standard for review
Focuses on the standard used specifically in a review process.
FAQs
How is the "criterion for analysis" used in research?
In research, the "criterion for analysis" serves as a benchmark against which data, results, or findings are evaluated. It ensures objectivity and consistency throughout the analytical process.
What are some alternatives to "criterion for analysis"?
You can use alternatives like "analytical standard", "basis for assessment", or "yardstick for evaluation", depending on the context.
How do I choose the right "criterion for analysis"?
Choose the "criterion for analysis" based on the objectives of your study or evaluation. Ensure that the chosen criteria are relevant, measurable, and aligned with the goals of your analysis.
What makes a good "criterion for analysis"?
A good "criterion for analysis" is specific, clearly defined, and directly related to the subject under examination. It should also be objective and consistently applicable.
Editing plus AI, all in one place.
Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Source & Trust
82%
Authority and reliability
4.3/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested