Sentence examples for criterion differences from inspiring English sources

References [4, 5] proposed two methods: the first one is the average wind method, which sets a criterion, differences in wind speeds <2 m/s, for the classification of incoming winds, and the average winds of the ones incident on aggregated wind turbines (AWTs) are used as equivalent winds.

Mean RTs, accuracy rate and response criterion differences (percentage of error, d' the measure of target detection sensitivity, c the measure of response criterion; [27]) were calculated separately for VS in the left and right hemifield and for easy and difficult feature search conditions, respectively.

A notable finding from both experiments involves criterion differences between the subclinically depressed and control groups.

Previously, the revision by Skounti et al. [ 34] suggested that the characteristics of the population, the study methods and the diagnostic criterion differences could explain part of the changes in the ADHD prevalence rates.

Criterion differences, and by implication their metacognitive origins, have very notable effects on remember and know judgements (Donaldson, 1996; Gardiner, Ramponi, & Richardson-Klavehn, 2002; Parks & Yonelinas, 2007; Postma, 1999; Wixted, 2007) that could substantially alter the view presented thus far on the effect of mood on memory; hence, these warrant systematic future investigation.

Since the MCI individuals in the two cohorts were diagnosed using slightly different criteria, differences between the two MCI groups could have affected the ability to independently assess the discrimination accuracy of the automated MRI measures.

The primary outcome criterion (difference of HbA1c value at baseline and after 6 months) was assessed in 178 patients (low group: n = 87, high group: n = 91); non-inferiority was demonstrated for the low group (p = 0.0022) with a mean difference of 0.24 in the low and of 0.16 in the high group.

To differentiate the different areas, plaque, lumen and aorta, the basic grayscale criteria differences were used, as each entity has a unique value that can be distinguished from the others.

The reasons could be due to genotyping different and too few markers; differences in case ascertainment and phenotype criteria; differences in ethnicity; and the occurrence of false negatives in the replication study or false positives in the initial studies.

To examine if visual impressions of smoothness or nonsmoothness align with the conclusions of these formal criteria, differences of scale must be accounted for, see Sect.

Multiple reasons have been described for this variation including differences in inclusion/exclusion criteria, differences in the setting in which the CPR was performed and problems with definitions of common variables [2, 3].