Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(2)
Exact(1)
Therefore, the purpose of this study was to examine the relative validity of two promising measures (one objective and the other subjective) compared to criterion data from the DLW method.
Similar(59)
After application of restrictive inclusion criteria, data from 45 cows, 22 with RP and 23 controls, were statistically compared.
539 abstracts were identified; 15 papers met the inclusion criteria; data from 9 studies were extracted (total: 146 fetuses, 11 children and 24 adults).
Using these criteria, data from 15 participants were excluded from all LI analyses.
Both DHF and SD were classified according to the WHO 1997 and 2009 criteria; data from entire clinical course were used to assess disease severity outcomes.
For the citations that met the criteria, data from full texts were extracted by one reviewer and checked independently for accuracy by a second reviewer.
Microscopy was used as the reference standard, and 90 studies were found to fit our inclusion criteria; data from these studies were used in this review.
a) Based on a clinical expert rating, questionnaire items were mapped on ICD-10 criteria; data from the Mental Health Module BELLAA study) were analyzed for relevant ICD-10 and cut-off criteria; b) Claims data were analyzed for relevant ICD-10 codes.
As DCEs can be used in order to quantify key stakeholders' willingness to 'trade-off' between conflicting transplant allocation criteria, data from the present study could in principle be used to underpin kidney transplant allocation policy thereby increasing transparency [ 29].
To develop these criteria, data from nine early arthritis cohorts were analysed to identify the factors (and their relative weights) associated with a clinical decision to start methotrexate (MTX) within the first 12 months.
Demographic and predictive criterion data were obtained from VIDUS using the participants' VIDUS ID codes, a use that was disclosed to participants as part of their informed consent.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com