The problem has a multi-criterion character in which 3 objective functions, 3 constraints and 5 variables are considered.
The problem has a multi-criterion character in which three objective functions, a maximum of 72 variables and 103 constraints are considered.
They were asked to rate each based on six criteria: character, security, location, staff, fun and cleanliness.
Chronic pain was defined as PMPS based on three criteria: character, location and timing of pain.
The criterion was character, not championships.
Of course, the cat-test is (arguably) not a valid criterion for character assessment.
The criterion of character complexity used to evaluate support spectra is not the same as the congruence criterion used in cladistics because cladistic congruence [ 127, 128] requires a tree topology and does not discern between character qualities (slow vs. fast evolving characters).
Taking the sum of positions as a single pattern supporting a split, then splits with larger, more complex patterns are thought to be more reliable as potential traces of phylogeny than splits with patterns consisting of few positions (criterion of character complexity as discussed in [ 121]).
In the context of a parsimony framework, congruence between (molecular and/or morphological) datasets has been suggested as a selection criterion for character change costs in sequence alignment and a subsequent tree search [ 58]; here, we use congruence to compare associate-host transformation methods.
According to the six check-criteria for character displacement suggested by Grant (1972) and Arthur (1982) and considering the remarks of Schluter and McPhail (1992), the following evaluation can be made: Chance can be ruled out as an explanation of the pattern, given that other cases of sympatry also constitute the same depth segregation of the two entities.
