Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(1)
There was no pattern of repeated QC failure by a single subject sampled on more than one occasion, neither was there correlation of failure with differential or % non-epithelial contamination. 1 The 233 samples were assessed by the established QC criteria and all those failing one or more were classified by which QC criteria were failed.
Similar(59)
In addition, a sensitivity analysis is conducted varying the percentage of by how much the criteria are failed between 85% and 95%.
Cases (c) to (e) indicate that although one of the P, B and T criteria is failed, the substance is still of very high concern as soon as it is characterized by LRTP.
Assuming that the vB criterion is failed by less than 5% (instead of 10%) reveals that 1,2-dichloro-4- trichloromethyl benzene would not be considered as a borderline chemical anymore since its estimated BCF (4,572 L kg-1,2-dichloro-4- trichloromethyl benzenee criterion for vB, 5,000 L kg-1,2-dichloro-4- trichloromethyl benzene
If the vB criterion may be failed by up to 15% instead, an additional substance 1-chloro-2- chlorodiphenylmethyl benzenee, CAS 42074-68-0) has to be considered more closely.
The final results of the analysis indicate that the there is approximately 95% confidence that the regulatory criteria under consideration would be failed given the high level of physical data provided.
If any of these criteria were not met, then the plate was failed and repeated.
He felt that the SIRS criteria were too vague, failed to include vital parameters, failed to consider the site of infection and failed to usefully assess severity of illness.
Exclusion criteria were patients with rheumatoid arthritis, failed previous hallux valgus surgery and symptomatic and/or radiological arthritis of the MTP joint.
The small airway epithelium samples from these subjects, which failed QC criteria, were compared to 11 matched small airway epithelium samples from individuals with COPD that passed QC criteria (see Additional file 1).
Publications that failed to verify these criteria were excluded.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com