Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
Exact(23)
Disagreements at the inclusion and exclusion criteria were discussed by LZ and SG and consensus was reached after discussion.
Items meeting one or more criteria were discussed and modified or deleted after a final discussion with stakeholders (i.e. members of the Steering Committee).
In addition, the loading criteria were discussed.
Magnetic field criteria were discussed for the design of the flipper.
Damage criteria were discussed for initiation and evolution of individual damage modes.
The social criteria were discussed in connection with the MCDA results.
Similar(37)
Evaluation criteria are discussed.
Aliasing and Nyquist criteria are discussed.
Damage tolerance criteria are discussed.
Implications on considerations for customary design criteria are discussed.
Criteria are discussed for defining the required reconciliation performance.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com