Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(3)
The evaluation criteria were analysed using the scales described above.
The EULAR response criteria were analysed using a relative risk (RR) with 95% CI for the difference in response between the two treatment groups.
Differences in acute toxicities and late toxicities reported using the RTOG criteria were analysed using the χ test for trend using groups based on grade 0/1/2+ and 0/1/2/3+, respectively.
Similar(57)
Akaike information criterion was analysed using a Cox proportional regression model to identify the parameter with the highest ability for discrimination of survival outcomes.
The remaining 523 sets of criterion weights were analysed using CA to produce sets of subgroup means for input into MCDAs of PSA testing.
The validation cohort and all the patients within the Milan criteria (Mazzaferro et al, 1996) were analysed using the method reported before (Wang et al, 2013).
Failing to meet criteria for normal distribution all data were analysed using non-parametric tests.
Images were analysed using validated criteria for OCT plaque characterisation and the quantification of the FCT [ 20, 21].
Accordingly, total costs were analysed using less restrictive criteria for Group 1, including all patients aged 17 70 years starting therapy for depressive symptoms.
Data were analysed using SPSS V.18.0, and p<0.05 was used as a criterion for statistical significance.
For records that provided explicit guidance on reporting of population modelling studies, the list of criteria identified was analysed using a thematic approach and the data was summarised as frequencies.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com