Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(2)
Exact(4)
By most criteria, the differences in living standards between developed and less-developed countries are more acute than the differences that exist between countries with developed economies.
When using high-quality raw data and liberal alignment criteria, the differences between the tools were relatively small.
According to MS-IDF-2005 MS-IDF-2005 MS-IDF-2005 [ 9] criteria the differences were very similar.
When AIC or LRT (p = 0.05) were used as model selection criteria, the differences in mentioned inclusion probabilities were relatively small ranging from 0 to 0.07.
Similar(56)
The prevalence rates in Western European (10.9%) and ethnic minority women (14.6%) with the WHO criteria were not significantly different (P=0.14), but with the modified IADPSG criteria, the difference was highly significant (24 and 36.8% respectively, P<0.001; Fig. 1, Table 2).
When we divided the migraine patients into two different subgroups (migraine with aura MA and migraine without aura MO), according to IHCD-II criteria, the difference reached the level of statistical significance only in MO subgroup.
For liver, by conventional criteria, the difference is considered to be borderline statistically significant by unpaired t-test (p = 0.048).
When stratified according to number of instability criteria at baseline (≥ 3 vs. < 3 criteria), the difference between MICO and control groups was not significant (P =.79 for ≥ 3 criteria; P =.12 for < 3 criteria).
There was no significant difference in GDM diagnosis between Arabs and South Asians with IADPSG criteria (P = 0.3); nevertheless, with the ADA criteria the difference was significant (P < 0.0005).
As anticipated, given the sample size and the selection criteria, the difference in all distributions is statistically very significant, with the exception of gender, which is nonetheless significantly different at the p =.05 level.
Although the fold-change is not a statistical criterion, the differences across tissues are dramatic.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com