To further examine the contributions of these two criteria, session-to-session transfers are performed using the training session which has the best classification result in the cross-validation for each subject.
By the second session both groups performed above the 80% criterion (session effect F 1,16) = 85.5, p < 0.001).
However, direct comparison is problematic, since in each of those studies high FA rates were among the exclusion criteria for session analysis.
Both groups required seven sessions to reach the 80% criterion (the session effect reflecting improved behavioral performance F 6,96) = 13.7, p < 0.001) across the two contexts.
For those patients who did not meet the assessment criteria, an additional session was arranged.
To avoid correlations bias due to sample size, statistical significance of all the correlations was assessed using the significance criteria for the session with smaller size.
From March 2014 to May 2015 a group of 40 patients, (33 females/7 malesufferingring from CTTH, diagnosed according to the IHS criteria, underwent 8 sessions of QMR treatment protocol, 2 treatments per week, lasting 20 minutes each.
Most of the rats achieved the 100 pellets per session criterion after 10 to 15 sessions.
For mice that did not reach criterion by the 41st session, the number of sessions to criterion was considered 42.
The GP referred patients with a weight-related health risk (see Section 2.2 for inclusion criteria) to an intake session with an LSA, commonly a practice nurse.
The trpc5-KD mice reached the criteria by the first session and continued stable responding for the duration of the experiments, whereas WT took several days to catch up to KD responding.
