Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(7)
The review shows substantial discrepancies between criteria reported for mould growth.
To predict target genes, we carried out a screening considering basic criteria reported for miRNA:mRNA target functional interactions defined in plants as indicated in methods [ 24, 25].
These subjects were selected from blood donors during the last two months of the patients' selection period and fulfilled the same exclusion criteria reported for the patient group.
Clinical features for the majority of subjects satisfied diagnostic criteria reported for NS, LEOPARD syndrome and cardiofaciocutaneous syndrome (53– 57), but individuals who lacked sufficient features for a definitive diagnosis were also included.
The following were criteria reported for selection ofsites: proximity and availability of health facilities, specific types of services offered such as maternal child health, mental health, the availability, and willingness of facility staffs to supervise students, and acceptance of students by community leadership.
Clinical features for the majority of these individuals satisfied diagnostic criteria reported for NS [van der Burgt et al. 1994], but a few individuals with a highly suggestive phenotype who lacked sufficient features to receive a definitive diagnosis were also included.
Similar(53)
The best overall response achieved, according to RECIST criteria, was reported for each patient.
Only the ANOVA results of contrasts orthogonal to the voxel selection criteria are reported for each region-of-interest (ROI).
ACR-based response criteria were reported for all seven drugs, while most of the other measures were available for three or four drugs.
Because of the many diagnostic criteria available for metabolic syndrome, power calculation was derived from systolic and diastolic blood pressure values (a universal component for all metabolic syndrome criteria) previously reported for OSA patients.
Good reliability and validity criteria have been reported for this checklist.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com