Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSimilar(60)
To determine the number of FS adopted in the mapping relationship based NAH (MRS-based NAH), two approaches are proposed to supply reasonable estimations with criteria of point-wise pressure and energy, respectively.
(b) Where the aerosol is classified as 'flammable' or 'extremely flammable' according to the criteria of point 1.9: — the flame symbol, in accordance with the model in Annex II to Directive 67/548/EEC; — the indication 'flammable' or 'extremely flammable', depending on the classification of the aerosol as 'flammable' or 'extremely flammable'".
According to the ISO certification criteria for point of care glucometers,glucose values must be within 20% of plasma reference more than 95% of the time, when glucose values >4.1 mmol/l.
In order to prove the existence criteria of critical points of the functional, some lemmas are given in Section 2. Two criteria for the existence of at least one solution and two solutions for BVP (1.1 - 1.2 1.1 - 1.2blished in Section 3 which is the generarezation for BVP of thestablishedr dinference equationSection
The eligibility criteria of 5 points scored on the screening algorithm aimed to identify high-risk women.
Two subjects (6.7%) of the control group and 15 (20.5%) of the diabetic patients showed abnormal FDTs based on the criteria of altered points.
The use of additional criteria for point selection was analyzed.
Taut band presence and pain recognition are the two most important clinical criteria of trigger point diagnosis, and referred pain is a confirmatory sign.
The criterion of abnormal points for FDT was defined by the presence of at least 5 points lower than P < 5%, 2 points lower than P < 2%, or 1 point lower than P < 1% on pattern deviation plot.
The criterion of 5 points is based on two previous studies conducted with Spanish fibromyalgia patients [ 21, 22].
Abnormal perimetries depending on the criterion of altered points showed a significant higher PSD value (P = 0.004) than normal tests (4.37 ± 0.5 and 3.62 ± 1.0, resp).
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com