"criteria of knowledge" is a grammatically correct phrase that can be used in written English.
It refers to the standards or principles used to determine what is considered valid or true knowledge. Example: The scientific community has established strict criteria of knowledge that must be met before a new theory can be accepted.
Bayle skillfully employed skeptical arguments about such things as sense information, human judgments, logical explanations, and the criteria of knowledge in order to undermine confidence in human intellectual activity in all areas.
According to Chisholm, epistemology consists of Socratic inquiry into the questions "What can we know?" and "What are the criteria of knowledge?" He thought that a puzzle faces anyone who attempts to answer these questions.
Professional providers sought to "activate" users' engagement with knowledge search by investing on their literacy, i.e. showing the basics of the logic of appropriateness informing their decision; and on trust relationships, i.e. becoming transparent on the criteria of knowledge selection during the innovation processes.
Lacking such an answer, Chisholm feared, one would not be in a position to be confident that any proposed criterion of knowledge was correct.
The criterion of knowledge along with contextual variables related to experience, economic dependence on forestry, and geographical residence were not associated with evaluations of effectiveness.
For the Mohists, the key criterion of knowledge is not the mere ability to make correct statements — as when the blind "use the names 'white' and 'black' in strings the same way" as the sighted — but the ability to "distinguish the things" denoted by these words (Book 19, "Condemning Aggression").
"We're still looking for someone who fits the criteria of training, knowledge, education, experience and skill," a government official said.
Later, during the Reformation and Counter-Reformation, the doctrinal controversies between Protestants and Roman Catholics raised fundamental epistemological issues about the bases and criteria of religious knowledge.
The starting set of criteria for knowledge evaluation was based on nine theoretical properties of information and knowledge (such as robustness or fitness for purpose), each with a 1-5 scale of evaluation, with a description of requirements for each score.
We applied the proposed method to obtain the weights of criteria for knowledge management evaluation by perceptual computing.
The general aims that integrate features of argumentation are focused on empowering students to talk and to write science as well as on supporting their enculturation into science communities and their acquisition of epistemic criteria for knowledge evaluation.
