Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(3)
On what basis do we apply naming criteria in practice?
The revision addressed issues that had arisen related to the use of the criteria in practice.
The variable application of these criteria in practice has been attributed to their inherent subjectivity and a lack of evidence to comprehensively evaluate screening interventions [ 50].
Similar(57)
While studies have examined the performance of these criteria in practice-based observational studies [ 2], one of the central elements of validating the criteria was to test their predictive validity, that is, whether being in remission at one time predicted good outcomes later.
Since both errors behave almost identically (compare Fig. 1 a, b) and since each node k can compute a local factorization error ∥A k −Q k R (k)∥2/∥A k ∥2 from its local data, we conjecture that such local error evaluation can be used also as a local stopping criterion in practice.
'Necessity,' while intuitively important, eluded definition and measurement and thus remained barely applied as a (systematic) selection criterion in practice until 2002.
Alternatively, it may be that there is limited use of cognitive impairment as a criterion in practice to allocate rehabilitation services.
However, the lack of diagnostic criteria in 33% of studies was a major limitation given the variability of diagnostic and screening criteria used in practice.
A validation study will be necessary to determine the utility of the criteria identified in practice.
Physician eligibility criteria were: in practice for more than 1 year since completing residency, see a minimum number of patients with diabetes per week (primary care physicians 5, specialists 10) and initiate insulin treatment for patients with diabetes.
Finally, we summarized the results in accurate decision trees, which allow use of the criteria in clinical practice or in the development of practice guidelines.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com