Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(23)
Group 1 (definite sepsis) had positive blood cultures and two or more criteria; Group 2 (probable sepsis) had an obvious source of infection and two or more additional criteria; Group 3 (possible sepsis) had fever and leukocytosis or leukopenia with no obvious source of infection nor positive blood culture; and Group 4 (nonseptic) had none of the criteria.
The patients were divided in two groups: Group A: 62 women with uncomplicated osteoporosis, defined as a T-score <-2.5 according to the WHO criteria; Group B: 38 women with osteoporosis, defined as above, but complicated by vertebral fractures.
We compared patients with APS confirmed by Sapporo criteria (Group 1) with patients with APS-like obstetrical complications with an aPL titer below the intermediate titer (Group 2).
No diagnostic failure with an immediate clinical impact was identified in the stability criteria group (SC group).
Amongst 430 patients, 148 fulfilled the stability criteria (stability criteria group) of which 122 (82 %) had no X-rays in the trauma bay.
Patients were categorized into two groups: those who fulfilled all stability criteria were classed in the stability criteria group (SC group), whilst those who failed to meet one or more of the criteria were classed in the no stability criteria group (NSC group).
Similar(37)
The model has been developed by using 16 criteria grouped in 4 clusters.
Leadership Skills Every manager at Sears is hired, promoted, and appraised on the basis of these 12 criteria, grouped in relation to the three P's.
Clinical features were not significantly different between the ICHD-3β and EO criteria groups (P > 0.05), and neither were outcomes of prophylaxis (P = 0.966).
The standardized checklist included 15 criteria, grouped according to the domains defined by QUADAS-2 [ 17].
5 Group 2 ('Exclusions') includes those who failed any of the criteria (groups 2 and 3 were mutually exclusive).
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com