Sentence examples for criteria for quantifying from inspiring English sources

NAT is a classic argument in organizational sociology although it has been criticized as having imprecise definitions and lacking criteria for quantifying complexity.

Anti-Robinson loss functions are global criteria for quantifying how far a similarity matrix is from a Robinson matrix and therefore how 'smooth and pleasant' the visual effect of the original matrix is not.

A subcommittee was established with experts pertaining to each activity category, defining criteria for quantifying the percentage time of the intensivists dedicated to each task, and taking into account occupational category.

The various theoretical developments, consisting of novel economic and environmental criteria for quantifying vehicle sustainability, could prove useful in the design of modern light-duty automobiles, with superior economic and environmental attributes.

A well-established criteria for quantifying the performance of prediction algorithms in machine learning area is the AUC, which can be calculated by the area under ROC curve.

There are common threads to all of the indices, such as descriptive diagnostic criteria and criteria for quantifying the amount of hard tissue loss.

Combined HR and movement sensing has emerged as a method to circumvent some of the limitations of the two respective methods and is a valid criterion measure for quantifying PAEE [ 23– 25].

The criterion for quantifying the performance of wind power forecasting is normalized root mean squared error (NRMSE).

Thus, in addition to classical performance indices, such as grade or recovery, partition curves are also a valuable criterion for quantifying the separation efficiency.

Initially, we introduce a criterion for quantifying forgiveness then we describe the methods for exploring the illustrative example and then the motivating example for warfarin.

For this classification, we first identified responses that were ILD-sensitive, defined as functions showing ILD-dependent variations in response strength of more than 50% of the maximum response of the ILD function, a well-established criterion for quantifying ILD sensitivity (Rose et al., 1963; Irvine et al., 1996).