Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(3)
Table 17 Statistical results of comparison of experimental and calculated CRI using normalized factor Pearson's correlation Sig (1-tailed) Number Measured CRI 1 - 3 Calculated CRI 0.984a 0.044 3 aCorrelation is significant at the 0.05 level (1-tailed).
Table 14 Statistical results of the comparison of experimental and calculated CRI using h NR /h BR Pearson's correlation Sig (1-tailed) Number Measured CRI 1 - 3 Calculated CRI 0.986a 0.043 3 aCorrelation is significant at the 0.05 level (1-tailed).
N was assumed to have an informative gamma prior distribution with median 10 (95% credible interval (CrI): 1, 28) (Beier et al., 1991).
Similar(57)
Double Edge (Edmund Niemann and Nurit Tilles; CRI 732; CD).
Based on the mark-resight approach, we estimated there were 420 [95% CrI:274 650] independent and 713 [95% CrI:474 1070] total brown bears in our 19,998km2 study area.
Median Se for the single intradermal comparative cervical tuberculin skin (SICCT) test (standard interpretation) was 0.50 and Bayesian credible intervals (CrI) were wide (95% CrI 0.26, 0.78).
Patients treated with rivaroxaban and apixaban are associated with a reduced risk of stroke compared to those treated with warfarin (OR 0.72, 95% CrI 0.53 to 0.88; OR 0.68, 95% CrI 0.48 to 0.91).
Seven patients achieved a CR with incomplete blood count recovery (CRi; 7%, 5 MRDneg) for a CR/CRi rate of 81/94 866%).
These counts translate to pre and post changepoint quarterly injury rates of 0.96 (95% CrI, 0.92, 1.02) and 0.72 (95% CrI 0.69, 0.74) per 10,000 population.
The average number of injuries in the quarter just before and after the changepoint was estimated to be 9.73 (95% CrI 7.49, 12.31) and 2.06 (95% CrI 0.84, 4.08), respectively.
Compared with placebo, statins reduced the risk of all-cause mortality (OR: 0.88; 95% CrI: 0.83-0.94; GRADE: moderate) and cardiovascular mortality (OR: 0.84; 95% CrI: 0.77-0.90; GRADE: high).
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com