Sentence examples for credibly prove from inspiring English sources

In the fourth film Mr Stone will credibly prove that Lyndon Johnson had Nicole Brown Simpson killed to discredit O.J. Simpson so he will not be believed when he reveals what he knows about Johnson and the war (not the least that Johnson is still alive and in hiding).

That movie, as we all know, is entitled "JFK .The sequel will be "MLK" in which Mr Stone will credibly prove that Lyndon Johnson had Martin Luther King killed ("Conspiracy in Memphis", December 18th) so greedy, uncaring, defence contractors would keep making money by selling arms to fight the war in Vietnam.

The third movie in the sequence would, of course, be "RFK" in which Mr Stone credibly proves that Lyndon Johnson had Robert Kennedy killed so that he would not be elected president and stop the war in Vietnam.

In the first movie Mr Stone credibly proves that Lyndon Johnson, with the aid of a cabal of New Orleans homosexuals, had John F. Kennedy killed so that Johnson could prosecute the war in Vietnam more vigorously than the peace-loving Kennedy who was on the verge of pulling out.

Rifkind, whose committee is under tremendous pressure to prove it can credibly keep tabs on UK's spy agencies, said on Thursday: "As with any significant stories concerning any of the intelligence agencies, we will require and receive a full report from them on this".

These amendments will credibly raise revenue and reduce costs.

UK Sport is focusing on sports that can "credibly demonstrate medal-winning potential within eight years".

Having these numbers at your fingertips will allow you to present your case more credibly, based on data that helps prove your case.

Although it is not yet known how popular the scheme will prove, it is clear that the fund could not credibly claim to want to support other countries on such a scale unless it had much more money.

To make them work, policymakers must commit credibly to act in the future in ways that will on occasion prove wildly inconsistent with their future preferences.

O'Hara notes, credibly, that this only proves politically beneficial if the voices are genuinely plural, not a chorus of parrots or sheep.