credibility on

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "credibility on" is not correct and does not convey a clear meaning in written English.
It may be intended to express the idea of relying on or trusting in someone's credibility, but it lacks proper context and structure. Example: "The report's credibility on the subject was questioned by several experts."

⚠ May contain grammatical issues

News & Media

Science

Wiki

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

55 human-written examples

Fiorina lost credibility on Wall Street.

The New Yorker

"I've got credibility on the line.

The New York Times

Mr Maliki staked his credibility on the operation and lost.

The Economist

It's because this administration has no credibility on this issue.

The New York Times

The administration has now lost all credibility on this issue.

The New York Times

Together, their credibility on the question was absolute.

The New Yorker

"He has total credibility on both sides," Batterman said.

The New York Times - Sports

Q Do you have any credibility on this issue?

The New York Times

Mattel still has to rebuild its credibility on Wall Street.

The New York Times

They have no credibility on the subject of child protection".

The Guardian

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

1 human-written examples

"We have no credibility on this issue when we're complicit ourselves.

The New York Times

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Instead of using "credibility on", opt for clearer and more grammatically sound alternatives such as "credibility regarding", "authority on", or "expertise in" depending on the context.

Common error

Using "on" with "credibility" can create ambiguity. Be precise by specifying the area or topic where credibility is relevant using prepositions like "regarding", "about", or "in".

Linguistic Context

While frequently used, the phrase "credibility on" functions awkwardly as a prepositional phrase aiming to specify the area where someone's credibility applies. Ludwig AI highlights its grammatical weakness.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

87%

Science

7%

Wiki

6%

Less common in

Formal & Business

0%

Academia

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

While the phrase "credibility on" appears frequently, Ludwig AI identifies it as grammatically questionable. To ensure clarity and grammatical correctness, consider using alternatives like "credibility regarding", "expertise in", or "authority on". These alternatives are more precise and avoid potential ambiguity. The high frequency of "credibility on" primarily stems from its use in News & Media, but its grammatical weakness warrants careful consideration and the use of more appropriate phrasing in formal writing.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

Credibility regarding

Replaces "on" with "regarding" for improved clarity and grammatical correctness.

Authority on

Focuses on expertise and recognized knowledge in a specific area.

Reliability concerning

Emphasizes the dependability and consistency of information.

Trustworthiness in

Highlights the aspect of being worthy of trust within a particular domain.

Expertise in

Similar to authority, but often implies a deeper, more practical knowledge.

Dependability regarding

Focuses on the consistency and reliability of a person or thing.

Credibility about

Uses "about" to specify the topic to which credibility refers.

Legitimacy concerning

Emphasizes the lawful or rightful aspect of credibility.

Integrity regarding

Highlights the moral and ethical dimension of credibility.

Reputation for

Refers to the general perception or belief about someone or something.

FAQs

What does "credibility on" mean?

The phrase "credibility on" is not grammatically sound and lacks a clear meaning. It is generally intended to convey the idea of someone having credibility regarding a particular subject or issue.

How can I use "credibility" correctly in a sentence?

Use "credibility" with prepositions like "regarding", "in", or "about" to clearly specify the area of expertise. For example, "His credibility "credibility regarding" climate change is questionable".

What are some alternatives to "credibility on"?

Depending on the context, you can use alternatives like "authority on", "expertise in", or "reliability concerning" to express the same concept more clearly.

Is it correct to say someone has "credibility on" a certain topic?

No, it's not grammatically correct. It's better to say someone has "credibility regarding" or "expertise in" a certain topic to convey the intended meaning more effectively.