Results of this equal variance t test indicated that significance was achieved in only seven questions: A4 (attractiveness dimension); C5 and C6 (creativity dimension); E1, E2, and E4 (engineering dimension); and F1 (overall performance dimension).
The framework presented here involves underlying dialogic processes from seven collaborative and creative dimensions that allow students to develop creativity.
Overall, the specific foresight toolbox composition in the various E-lab expert workshops was selected and tailored according to the theme, combining techniques from both the expertise-interaction and the creativity-evidence dimensions [10, 23].
The projects scored lower on average for the Creativity and Novelty dimensions (2.83 and 2.17 respectively) while for the dimension of Plausibility the average score for all project was the highest (3.50 on a [0, 4] scale).
This study investigates the important composition of creativity by examining dimensions of restaurant space design from the expert's perspective.
Furthermore, the projects were rated with respect to their quality on six dimensions: creativity, novelty, motivation, plausibility, technical soundness and understandability.
To that end, the facilitator assessed the outcome of the projects on a 5-point Likert scale (for the range [0, 4]) on six dimensions: Creativity, Novelty, Motivation, Plausibility, Technical Soundness, Understandability.
Like the co-authors, this creativity takes activist dimensions.
It provides a model which analyzes creativity according to three dimensions: process, product, and teaching.
