create harm

USAGE SUMMARY

"create harm" is correct and usable in written English.
You could use it when you are talking about someone or something causing harm to another person, group of people, or the environment. For example: "The company created harm by dumping toxic waste in the river."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Academia

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

13 human-written examples

But who is accountable when the employees of foreign private firms do violence or create harm?

Yale University

Gopalakrishnan says that while technology can benefit all of our lives, it also has the capacity to create harm.

The Guardian

The strategy went on to say "all products (from cars through to high-fat foods to pet dogs) potentially create harm.

The Guardian

"No one," says Carl Safina, an oceanographer and MacArthur fellow who has published several books on marine life, "had ever thought that humans could create something that could create harm all over the globe and come back and get in our bodies".

The New York Times - Magazine

"No one," says Carl Safina, an oceanographer and MacArthur fellow who has published several books on marine life, "had ever thought that humans could create something that could create harm all over the globe and come back and get in our bodies". Safina took me out in his sea kayak around Lazy Point, an eastern spoke of Long Island, to see three kinds of terns, which zipped around us over the bay.

The New York Times - Magazine

In the case of migration, poorly informed policies have also created and continue to create harm.

IZA Journal of Development and Migration

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

47 human-written examples

The instability these unnecessary crises create harms the economy and hurts Latino businesses and workers alike.

Huffington Post

If a treatment is not medically necessary but does create harms for others, including contributions toward health inequities in the destination country and public expenses for follow-up care in the patient's home country, then she can reasonably be held responsible for these negative effects.

Globalization and Health

Even though, it is not expected that the SUPPORT model will actually create harms, at least physiological, to the patient, this is not always the case for other diagnostic tests that may be more invasive (e.g. screening for prostate cancer).

BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making

"If [field conditions] are what's necessary to show whether something creates harm or not, then why didn't they do it?" Goulson says.

The Guardian

Followers of Jainism believe that creating harm in the environment is inevitable, but it is their responsibility to minimize that, Chapple said.

Yale University

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "create harm", consider the specific type of harm being caused (physical, emotional, environmental) to choose the most accurate and impactful language. For example, instead of saying "the policy created harm", specify what kind of harm: "the policy created economic harm for small businesses."

Common error

Avoid using "create harm" as a generic placeholder for negative consequences. Instead, replace it with more specific terms like "damage", "injure", or "undermine" to convey the precise impact of the action.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "create harm" functions as a verb phrase, where "create" is the main verb and "harm" is the direct object. According to Ludwig AI, it is correctly used to describe the action of causing damage or injury. The examples show a variety of subjects that can "create harm", from companies and policies to individual choices.

Expression frequency: Uncommon

Frequent in

News & Media

50%

Academia

30%

Science

20%

Less common in

Formal & Business

0%

Wiki

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "create harm" is a grammatically sound and usable expression signifying the act of causing damage or injury. According to Ludwig AI, it is accurate and appropriate for use in written English. While not overly frequent, it appears across various contexts, including news, academia, and science. To enhance clarity, consider specifying the nature of the harm being created. While acceptable in diverse settings, it's advisable to avoid generic usage and opt for more precise terms to accurately reflect the intended meaning. Remember to examine the context in order to choose the most suitable option among alternatives such as "cause damage", "inflict injury" and "generate destruction".

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

cause damage

Focuses more on the resulting damage rather than the act of creating the harm.

inflict injury

Implies a direct action that results in harm or damage, often physical.

generate destruction

Emphasizes large-scale negative impact.

produce negative consequences

Focuses on the outcomes and results of an action.

lead to suffering

Highlights the emotional or physical distress caused.

give rise to adversity

More formal and emphasizes the emergence of difficult situations.

precipitate misfortune

Implies hastening the arrival of an unfortunate event.

engender detriment

A more formal way of saying to cause detriment or damage.

initiate adversity

Focuses on the beginning of hardship or misfortune.

foster affliction

Suggests nurturing or encouraging pain and suffering.

FAQs

How can I use "create harm" in a sentence?

You can use "create harm" when referring to actions or policies that cause damage or injury. For instance: "The company's pollution created harm to the environment."

What can I say instead of "create harm"?

You can use alternatives like "cause damage", "inflict injury", or "generate destruction" depending on the context.

Which is correct, "create harm" or "cause harm"?

Both "create harm" and "cause harm" are grammatically correct and convey a similar meaning. The choice depends on the specific nuance you want to express. "Create harm" suggests bringing harm into existence, while "cause harm" implies directly leading to harm.

What's the difference between "create harm" and "do harm"?

"Create harm" implies bringing harm into being, possibly through indirect means, while "do harm" suggests a more direct action with the intent or effect of causing damage. For example, an unintentional policy can "create harm", while a malicious act is intended to "do harm."