Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(5)
The results showed that acamprosate treated patients showed significantly reduced craving compared to placebo.
On average, participants scored significantly higher on cognitive craving compared to cue-induced craving at all time points.
A higher retention in care and higher rates of opioid-free urine screens were observed along with a significant reduction in opioid craving compared to placebo.
A groundbreaking research study [ 45], demonstrated that rTMS applied to the left PFC might inhibit food craving compared to sham rTMS in healthy women considered "strong cravers".
As anticipated, the craving induction resulted in a significant increase in subjective craving compared to the control induction, but contrary to predictions, it was not associated with greater relative value of alcohol.
Similar(55)
The addition of the induction type in a second model significantly improved the model (Δ R2 =.17, F (1, 32) = 18.52, p <.001) and reflected a significant increase in craving for individuals receiving the craving induction compared to the control induction, as depicted in Figure 1.
High frequency (excitatory) rTMS to the left DLPFC can reduce food craving [34], cigarette smoking [35] and cocaine craving [36] compared to sham TMS.
Passively attending to food pictures yielded significantly higher craving scores compared to engaging in CR.
Using a mixed model to analyze the crossover design, the music intervention was found to have a statistically significant advantage in craving reduction compared to the noise control.
With regard to the effects of the craving induction compared to the control induction, the discrepancy between the factorial and continuous findings provides only mixed support for the visceral theory.
A statistical comparison of the proportions of subjects who attained 25%, 50 %, 75 and 90%and90%tions in creductionsre compared to baseline within 1, 3, 5 and 10 min, respecraving, further scorerted the overall differencomparedd.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com