Exact(18)
The Community Periodontal Index (CPI) code [ 18] was recorded.
GOHAI scores of subjects with CPI code 4 were significantly lower than those of subjects with CPI code 0 2 and subjects with no index teeth.
The prevalence of higher CPI defined as a CPI code ≥ 3 was 30.9% (code 4 was 5.9%).
The highest code level among the six segments was regarded as the maximum CPI code for the individual.
In contrast, "CPI code 4" did not show a significant AOR with very poor OHRQoL levels, although a significant crude odds ratio was observed (Table 5).
A tooth recorded as CPI code 4 would be likely to show a high grade of mobility, which might have confounded the two measures.
Similar(42)
The highest CPI codes were recorded in each sextant.
World Health Organization (WHO) CPI codes are also recorded as an assessment of periodontitis.
The proportion of subjects having CPI codes of 0, 1, 2 and 3 as their highest individual score were respectively, 37.0%, 4.4%, 56.9% and 1.7% in the urban and 31.7%, 2.8%, 65.3% and 0.2% in the rural area.
CPI codes of 0 4 were given: healthy cases and absence of gingival bleeding (score 0), gingival bleeding (score 1), presence of supra or subgingival calculus (score 2), probing pocket depth of 4 5 mm (score 3) or probing pocket ≥6 mm (score 4), respectively.
The main assumption behind CPI is that coding passes belonging to the highest bitplanes have greater rate-distortion contributions than coding passes belonging to the lowest bitplanes.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com