covered with particles

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "covered with particles" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to describe an object or surface that has a layer or coating of small particles on it. Example: "The surface of the moon is covered with particles that have been created by countless impacts over millions of years."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

News & Media

Academia

Wiki

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

3 human-written examples

JERRY JOHNSTON: Less than 0.001 percent of the area could be covered with particles of any kind.

Harvard University

During the whole of Monday and Tuesday our decks had been covered with particles of fine dust, of about the same description that steamers which encounter a sand storm in the Red Sea get aboard.

The Guardian

In the photomicrographs of regular powder G, most of the surface of the TEM grid was covered with particles > 5 μm in diameter, with only a few separate nanoparticles.

Environmental Health Perspectives

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

57 human-written examples

A corridor linking the two wings of the building has, for years, had double-locked doors whose glass panels are covered with particle board.

The New York Times

Therefore, the silicon under K2SiF6 particles was retained, while the silicon not covered with K2SiF6 particles was etched away, leading to micropillar structure on the silicon substrate.

Nanoscale Research Letters

With the time growing, it could be seen that the surface of graphene were covered with SiO2 particles when the reaction time was 6 h (Figure 7c); SiO2 particles became larger than that of Figure 7b, but had not completely grown to round shape.

Nanoscale Research Letters

In the right panels, the droplet covered with green particles appears smaller due to the optical lens effect looking through the droplet covered with red particles.

Nature

If there is a better method for polluting a clean water supply than having little fingers covered with faecal particles, I don't know what it is.

The Guardian

In particular, the surface of STS substrate was completely covered with Ag particles for the film annealed at 550 °C.

Surface and Coatings Technology

The stability of capillary-pinned bubble pairs covered with hydrophobized particles in aqueous solutions of 1-pentanol or methyl isobutyl carbinol (MIBC) was studied using high-speed cinematography.

Chemical Engineering Science

An analysis is carried out of oxygen reduction under limiting diffusion conditions on a rotating disk electrode partially covered with platinum particles ('particulate electrode').

Electrochimica Acta

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When describing cleanliness standards, use "covered with particles" followed by a precise measurement to emphasize the level of cleanliness required.

Common error

Avoid using "covered with particles" in casual writing; opt for simpler terms like "dusty" or "gritty" for better readability.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "covered with particles" functions as a descriptive prepositional phrase, modifying a noun by indicating that it has a surface layer or coating of small pieces. According to Ludwig AI, the phrase is correct and usable in written English.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

Science

45%

News & Media

25%

Academia

15%

Less common in

Wiki

10%

Formal & Business

3%

Reference

2%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "covered with particles" is a grammatically sound and versatile prepositional phrase frequently used to describe surfaces coated with small pieces. Ludwig AI confirms its correctness and usability. While suitable for scientific, news, and academic contexts, it should be used judiciously in informal writing. Related phrases include "coated with particulate matter" and "layered with minute fragments". Remember to be precise about the type and size of particles for clarity. The phrase sees common usage across a wide array of authoritative sources, marking it as a reliable and effective descriptive tool.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

coated with particulate matter

Replaces "particles" with a more formal term "particulate matter" which is scientifically oriented.

layered with minute fragments

Substitutes "covered" with "layered" and "particles" with "minute fragments", changing the descriptive words while retaining the concept.

surfaced with fine grains

Changes "covered" to "surfaced" and "particles" to "fine grains", offering a slightly different visual.

dusted with specks

Replaces "covered" with "dusted" implying a lighter coating and "particles" with "specks".

scattered with tiny pieces

Emphasizes distribution by using "scattered" instead of "covered" and specifies "tiny pieces" instead of "particles".

strewn with fragments

Indicates a scattered distribution with "strewn", replacing "covered", and uses "fragments" in place of "particles".

smothered in bits

Implies a heavy coating, changing "covered" to "smothered" and using "bits" instead of "particles".

topped with granules

Changes "covered" to "topped" indicating a layer on the upper surface and "particles" to "granules".

mantled with atoms

Uses "mantled" implying a covering like a cloak and "atoms" instead of "particles", suitable for scientific contexts.

faced with motes

Replaces "covered" with "faced" and "particles" with "motes", which are small particles of dust or substance.

FAQs

How can I rephrase "covered with particles" to sound more formal?

For a more formal tone, consider using phrases such as "coated with particulate matter", "layered with minute fragments", or "surfaced with fine grains".

What's the difference between "covered in dust" and "covered with particles"?

"Covered in dust" typically implies a fine, powdery substance, while "covered with particles" is a more general term that can refer to particles of any size or composition.

Is "covered with particles" suitable for scientific writing?

Yes, "covered with particles" is appropriate for scientific writing, especially when describing experimental conditions or material properties. However, be specific about the type and size of the particles when possible.

What are some less common alternatives to "covered with particles"?

Less common but still valid alternatives include "strewn with fragments", "smothered in bits", or "topped with granules", depending on the context.