Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(1)
In the result tables, these results are shown in the fields " M NG" (NG=No Gene) for the number of matched mutations and the " Rec NG" for the proportion of mutations covered from the reference set.
Similar(59)
You're covered from the get-go.
The demographic imbalance translates to a worrying imbalance in the topics covered on the reference site.
The genomes of Arthrobacter arilaitensis GMPA29 and Psychrobacter immobilis PG1 are almost entirely covered (from 99.5 to 99.9% of the reference size), showing that the detected strains were closely related to the reference strains.
Contigs from this assembly covered most of the reference genomes of all 13 yeast species present (average = 96.0%), with the exception of P. pastoris (13.7%), which also had a very low fraction of shotgun reads aligning to it (1.2%), confirming its low abundance in the sample.
Our maps covered ~90% of the reference genome on average.
To estimate heterozygosity (heterozygous SNPs/kb), mpileup genotyping analysis (described above) was used and the number of heterozygous SNPs was calculated at the reference bases covered from 5 to 10 fold.
The signals from both transistors were recorded, and then, the signal from the reference transistor (covered with the "blank" membrane) was subtracted from the signal of the transistor covered with the enzymatic membrane (biorecognition element).
Typically, these sites will be covered by many reads that differ from the reference genome (68, 70).
The path from the root to the hypothesis is used as supporting knowledge to explain the prediction's outcome whereas the actual prediction is built from the reference dataset examples covered by the hypothesis using a kNN [26] algorithm (Figure 17).
We then used Samtools v0.1.19 mpileup [ 50] to call genotype at sites and only considered genotype calls as SNPs, if they are different from the reference base and covered by at least 4 reads with minimum base and mapping quality of 20.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com