"coverage of costs" is an acceptable phrase in written English.
It typically refers to insurance payments that help cover expenses related to medical care, automobile repairs, or legal services. Example: The insurance company's coverage of costs helped the family pay for their daughter's medical treatment.
The unnamed cheerleader who has decided to go by P.G.G. in the complaint is seeking for herself, and all others similarly situated, back-pay equal to the unpaid compensation for hours worked, unpaid overtime compensation, as well as liquidated damages, reasonable attorney's fees and coverage of costs.
57 Coverage of costs by health authorities or health insurers for these preparations and novel prescriptions to patients who have not received other treatments should be discouraged.
These payments represent supplementary financial support and are not intended to provide full coverage of costs incurred for long-term care.
Only patients who had completed the intensive phase of treatment (generally 2 months) and one month of the continuation phase of treatment were included, to ensure a wide coverage of costs.
The national report of an evaluation of the permission of PC activities by German health care insurances shows that the coverage of costs for specialised home care PC was denied especially (I) if patients were privately insured or (II) were suffering from a non-malignant disease [6].
For maximum coverage of costs, no relevant cost item was excluded from the study on à priori assumptions that it would be of a so modest magnitude that the cost of checking it further would not be reflected in a corresponding increase in the value of the study's results [ 12].
Coverage of cost-effective maternal health services remains poor due to insufficient supply and inadequate demand for these services among the poorest groups.
Overall, conditional on the policymakers' decision to introduce competition in health insurance, it appears valuable to leave private insurers some room for the design of their plans, as long as the policy environment makes a significant attempt at muting risk-selection incentives and at discouraging prescription drug insurers from having poor coverage of cost-effective medications.
Expanding coverage of cost-effective interventions to treat these conditions will drive down child mortality significantly.
Cross-country comparisons show that health outcomes improved and coverage of cost-effective interventions increased with more health workers.
An estimated 18% to 37% of neonatal deaths, defined as deaths occurring during the first 28 days of life, could be averted through expanded coverage of cost-effective interventions, if delivered through family or community approaches [ 2].
