The Court invited me down to London and I had an interview with Simon Curtis and Antonia Bird.
The claim that the court invited a backlash by getting too far ahead of public opinion does not hold.
The court invited lawyers to submit letters about the plan and held a forum last month to hear from some of them.
On Oct. 18, the appeals court invited Michael H. Hites, chief technology officer of the Illinois Institute of Technology, to a briefing session tentatively scheduled for Nov. 14.
The court invited the Legislature to come up with a remedy, either by including gay couples in the state's marriage laws or by creating a parallel system.
The couple's lawyers argue that there is no danger because the appeals court invited the C.I.A. to invoke a "state secrets privilege" as the case goes forward.
Since side endorses the part of the 11th Circuit's decision concerning severability, the court invited a second Washington lawyer, H. Bartow Farr III, to make the argument that the provision "is severable from the entirety of the remainder of the act".
Would you know any of this if you read the judgment of the UK supreme court in R v Horncastle, in which the court invited the Strasbourg court to "think again" concerning its ruling in the al-Khawaja case?
Over Microsoft's objection, the district court invited Prof. Lawrence Lessig, the same professor whom this court prevented from acting as special master in the prior consent decree action, to participate as amicus curiae.
By doing so, he said, the court invited the "controversy, conflict and chaos" that Congress meant to avoid when it enacted Section 5 in 1887, in response to the electoral deadlock in the Hayes-Tilden presidential election of 1876.
