Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(60)
This, in substance, is what the lower courts held.
In 1911 the courts held the patent "valid but not infringed" by Ford.
Too rarely are errant police, prosecutors and courts held to account by external overseers.
But because the act had already been performed the courts held that their petition was "moot".
Ultimately the courts held that copyright law did not cover these broad elements.
It would be particularly hard in Washington State, whose courts held that its criminal libel laws were unconstitutional.
6 Both appellate courts held that under the lease the Authority's reasons for terminating petitioner's tenancy were immaterial.
Both courts held respondent's salary was free from tax on the authority of New York ex rel.
Hungarian courts held the portal liable for reputational harm to a business caused by "false and offensive" user statements.
Both of these courts held that it did not; no federal court had ruled to the contrary.
In both cases, the courts held that the Arizona neovoucher approach involved spending by private individuals, not by the state.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com