Sentence examples similar to courses of argumentation from inspiring English sources

This line of argumentation is called an indispensability argument (Colyvan 2001).

Yet, there is no research on what a course on argumentation might look like.

More specifically, the aim was to build a bridge between these two streams of research by showing how medical education can benefit from specific training courses in argumentation.

In this paper we focus on the potential of a course in argumentation as a promising way to empower doctors in presenting their viewpoints and addressing those of patients.

Ultimately, students who are taught the principles of argumentation as part of their science courses have the potential to perform better on assessments that require reasoning (Bao et al., 2009; Osborne, 2010).

As part of a project on argumentation in doctor patient interactions, we developed a training course in argumentation targeting doctors who are active in the field of chronic pain.

In light of this, we infer that doctors would benefit from a training course in argumentation.

2) The structure of argumentation The structure of argumentation The second module of the course was devoted to explaining the structure of argumentation to identify the type of differences of opinion at stake, the standpoints and the premises expressed by the interlocutors.

Despite the existence of studies showing the value of argumentation in doctor patient interactions, there is no evidence that a training course for health professionals exists, and there is no description in the literature of what such a course might look like.

This paper enriches the research in the field of medical education by showing how and why doctors and health professionals in general can benefit from a specific training course in argumentation.

In light of the pedagogical foundations of the course, its content was developed in an eclectic way, by bringing together different aspects of the most prominent theories of argumentation.