counts of dishonesty

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "counts of dishonesty" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used in legal or formal contexts to refer to specific allegations or charges related to dishonest behavior. Example: "The defendant faced multiple counts of dishonesty, including fraud and embezzlement."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

2 human-written examples

Mr Evans left the police force following his conviction on nine counts of dishonesty, Mr Sherborne said.

Independent

Wakefield, formerly based at a U.K. hospital, was convicted in 2010 by the British General Medical Council of four counts of dishonesty and 12 counts of endangering children; he lost his license to practice medicine, retracted multiple articles, and lost his job at his Texas enterprise Thoughtful House.

Science Magazine

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

58 human-written examples

"It's not a question of dishonesty.

The New York Times

"To me, it just smelled of dishonesty.

The New York Times

That's one sort of dishonesty.

The Guardian

One cannot possibly accuse Pullinger of dishonesty.

The Guardian - Books

All the signs of dishonesty played over them.

The New Yorker

Each accused the other of dishonesty and of misleading voters.

The New York Times

Former BBC DG accuses BBC trust of dishonesty.

The Guardian - Opinion

Gingrich, interviewed on CBS on Sunday, accused Romney of dishonesty.

The Guardian

"There's a lot of dishonesty about this.

The Guardian

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

In formal writing, consider alternatives like "charges of dishonesty" or "allegations of dishonesty" for broader appeal.

Common error

Avoid using "counts of dishonesty" in casual conversations or informal writing. The phrase is best suited for legal or very formal settings. In everyday language, simpler terms like "instances of lying" or "dishonest acts" are more appropriate.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "counts of dishonesty" functions as a noun phrase, typically serving as the subject or object in sentences related to legal or ethical violations. It indicates a specific number of instances where dishonest behavior has been identified. Ludwig AI's analysis indicates correct and usable grammar.

Expression frequency: Rare

Frequent in

News & Media

50%

Science

50%

Formal & Business

0%

Less common in

Academia

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "counts of dishonesty" is a noun phrase used in formal contexts to enumerate instances of dishonest behavior. As Ludwig AI explains, it is grammatically correct and primarily used in legal and news-related settings. The term's formal nature restricts its use in casual conversations, where simpler alternatives are more suitable. While its frequency is rare, its specific applications demand precision, making it crucial in contexts requiring a formal assessment of misconduct.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

Charges of deceit

Substitutes "counts" with "charges" and "dishonesty" with "deceit", emphasizing the accusation of deceptive behavior.

Incidents of falsehood

Substitutes "counts" with "incidents" and "dishonesty" with "falsehood", referring to specific occurrences of untrue statements.

Instances of deception

Replaces "counts" with "instances" and "dishonesty" with "deception", focusing on the occurrence of deceptive acts.

Findings of untruthfulness

Replaces "counts" with "findings" and "dishonesty" with "untruthfulness", highlighting conclusions reached about a lack of truth.

Acts of fraud

Replaces "counts of dishonesty" with a more specific term, "acts of fraud", indicating deliberate deception for financial gain.

Cases of misrepresentation

Replaces "counts of dishonesty" with "cases of misrepresentation", indicating instances where information was falsely presented.

Allegations of fraudulence

Replaces "counts of dishonesty" with "allegations of fraudulence", highlighting unproven claims of fraudulent actions.

Accusations of duplicity

Replaces "counts of dishonesty" with "accusations of duplicity", emphasizing formal charges of deceitful behavior.

Number of fraudulent activities

Changes the structure to emphasize the numerical aspect of fraudulent activities, rather than formal counts.

Record of deceptive practices

Replaces "counts of dishonesty" with "record of deceptive practices", focusing on a documented history of deceptive actions.

FAQs

How can I use "counts of dishonesty" in a sentence?

"Counts of dishonesty" is typically used in legal or formal contexts. For example: "The defendant faced multiple counts of dishonesty, including fraud and embezzlement."

What are some alternatives to "counts of dishonesty"?

Alternatives include "charges of dishonesty", "allegations of dishonesty", or "instances of deception".

In what contexts is "counts of dishonesty" most appropriate?

This phrase is most appropriate in formal and legal settings, such as court documents, official reports, and journalistic accounts of legal proceedings.

Is "counts of dishonesty" the same as "acts of dishonesty"?

While similar, "counts of dishonesty" usually implies a formal listing of specific charges or findings, whereas "acts of dishonesty" is a more general term referring to dishonest actions.