"counted as correct" is correct and can be used in written English.
You can use it when referring to something being accepted as being accurate and in conformance with standards. Example sentence: The answer was counted as correct by the teacher.
Hence, this example supports the realist linkage of success and truth by revealing that the parts of theory actually put to work in generating successful predictions continue to be counted as correct.
As I've mentioned here before, if you solve online, you will find that there are a limited number of ways to enter a rebus and have it counted as correct, and when there are multiple ways to enter that rebus, we run into what greater minds than mine call "issues".
The "rules" that one might plausibly discern in the language that one speaks are not, as rules, already there, in a ghostly way, guiding what one says; they are either generalizations from the finite data of what is counted as correct or incorrect, or they are rules that, as Wittgenstein metaphorically expressed it, one puts away in the archives one adopts the rule, but only after the fact.
Noun synonyms were counted as correct (e.g., cleaner instead of detergent).
cAs reported in [15]: "A note event is counted as correct if the transcribed and the real note do overlap".
To estimate performance without a guessing component, we can also calculate performance in the manner of Experiment 1, where trials were counted as correct only if observers made a correct response within 2 s after the target changed its state.
This should be at the forefront of any ESL teacher's mind, he says: "ESL teachers don't need to relearn English - they need to be aware that what counts as correct English does vary.
They determine what counts as correct "describing," "sorting," and "matching" of names and things and thus what knowledge is.
The other reading is interpretive no pattern of correct past use (no social practice) uniquely determines what concrete behavior counts as correct here-now (or in the future).
The relations of "same" and "different" determine what counts as correct matching of names and stuff and thus what knowledge is.
However one could also hold that in such circumstances there are two equally good logics, neither of which counts as correct.
