Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(2)
Exact(2)
The precision and recall scores are calculated on the cell-base count of errors.
Given that count of errors (and their respective residuals) in this study did not follow a normal distribution and were overdispersed, the negative binomial distribution was a good fit for these data; this distribution is a conservative choice, however, as demonstrated by the wide CIs reported for CPT error outcomes.
Similar(58)
To generate the final summary score for each assembly, within each species the count of error free bases, N50 and broken N50 were normalized as follows.
The system of quality control in radiology should progress beyond the counting of errors and move on to group learning and error prevention [11].
A loss function for approximating the empirical loss related to the soft count of classification errors is defined as l k X, Φ W = 1 1 + exp − γ d k ( X, Φ W, (11).
The primary outcome measure was change in the count of diagnostic errors of omission (DEO).
Count the number of errors for each vote tally k. 7.
To simplify the calculations in this section, we do not count the number of errors on the test set when evaluating a classifier, but instead look at how well the classifier estimates the conditional probability of a document being in a class.
During the process we keep track of the inliers rate within the set C ab, as well as the time required by each technique to determine their best correspondence triplet within C ab. Once the alignments are terminated, we visually inspect the alignment outcome and count the number of errors for each technique, reported in Table 1.
where λ 1 = γ − N B log 1 − P ~ B 1 − P B − N W log 1 − P ~ W 1 − P W. This expression has the practical advantage to only count the number of errors in order to perform the authentication task but at a cost of a loss of optimality.
This is not surprising since the binary thresholding removes information from the gray-level observation, yet this has a practical impact because one practitioner can be tempted to count the number of errors as given in (14) as an authentication score for its easy implementation.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com