Suggestions(1)
Exact(11)
Motivational interviewing is a person-centered counseling style used to promote behavioral change regarding a wide variety of lifestyle problems.
Rather, we tailor our counseling style to the needs of the client, often calling upon a variety of perspectives.
To test if basic training for dietitians in motivational interviewing (MI) resulted in changes in dietitians' counseling style and improvements in their patients' diet and risk parameters.
Parameter 3 might relate to societal trends, counseling style or the counselor's medical specialty [ 24].
This counseling style is typically done in verbal exchanges and has been shown to have greater effects when conducted in multiple sessions of greater than 20 minutes [ 17].
According to these authors "motivational interviewing is a directive, client-centered counseling style for eliciting behavior change by helping clients to explore and resolve ambivalence" [ 14].
Similar(49)
For example, geneticists and genetic counselors have received different training and might have different counseling styles resulting in better or worse outcomes.
This study is the first to show the percentage of variance at the counselor level and this might provide insight into the extent to which differences in individual counseling styles affect genetic counseling outcomes.
Inappropriate variation might be due to non-medical factors, such as differences in counseling styles [ 15] or workload as small list sizes can be associated with high consultation rates [ 30].
Additionally, genetic counselors must adjust their counseling styles to the disclosure of the DNA-results being the first order of business, without having built up a counselor-patient relationship beforehand.
A potential source of variation in our data is in the level and depth of counseling/consenting provided to families referred for exome sequencing from clinicians with inherently different counseling styles, from clinics with varying levels of patient loads and processes.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com