could progresses

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "could progresses" is not correct in English.
It seems to be a combination of "could" and "progresses," which do not fit together grammatically. Example: "If we could progress further in our project, we would meet the deadline."

⚠ May contain grammatical issues

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

60 human-written examples

Now we could progress.

The Guardian

Any two teams could progress.

The Guardian - Sport

What could progress possibly mean in a place like this?

The New York Times - Books

Start with that and we could progress to education free at the point of delivery.

The Guardian

However, in a group with no clear favourites Besiktas could progress.

The Guardian - Sport

This could progress to a contagion across several continents that will prove difficult to contain.

The New York Times

Two lanes to her left, Jeter caught Campbell-Brown but could progress no further.

The New York Times - Sports

The Ospreys, meanwhile, could progress, but it is not guaranteed even if they win their last two games.

The Guardian - Sport

"The best thing is if he could progress from a 5-minute guy to a 15-minute guy.

The New York Times - Sports

When asked how far he thought City could progress in the Champions League, Ibrahimovic added: "It depends who they play against.

The Guardian - Sport

Ghana could progress to the last 16 if they beat Portugal and Germany beat the Americans.

BBC

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When aiming to express potential advancement, ensure the verb form agrees with the modal verb. Use "could progress" or "might progress" instead of "could progresses".

Common error

Avoid using the third-person singular present tense (e.g., "progresses") after modal verbs like "could", "should", or "might". These verbs require the base form of the verb (e.g., "progress").

Linguistic Context

The phrase "could progresses" attempts to express a potential action or state. However, it's grammatically incorrect as modal verbs like "could" must be followed by the base form of the verb (e.g., progress, advance). Ludwig AI identifies this as an error.

Expression frequency: Missing

Frequent in

Science

0%

News & Media

0%

Formal & Business

0%

Less common in

Science

0%

News & Media

0%

Formal & Business

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "could progresses" is grammatically incorrect. Modal verbs like "could" require the base form of the verb, so the correct form would be "could progress". Ludwig AI confirms this, and provides examples where similar concepts are expressed using correct grammar. For expressing the idea of a possible advancement, consider using alternatives such as "could advance", "might progress", or "may develop". These options maintain grammatical accuracy while effectively conveying the intended meaning.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

could advance

Replaces "progresses" with a more standard verb form "advance" that fits grammatically with "could".

could move forward

Substitutes "progresses" with the phrasal verb "move forward", offering a clearer and more common way to express advancement.

might progress

Replaces "could" with "might", which maintains a similar level of possibility while using the correct verb form of "progress".

may advance

Replaces "could" with "may" and "progresses" with "advance" to create a grammatically correct expression of possibility and improvement.

can develop

Uses "can" instead of "could" and "develop" instead of "progresses" to suggest potential growth or evolution.

can improve

Employs "can" and "improve" to convey the potential for betterment or enhancement.

might evolve

Replaces "progresses" with "evolve" to suggest a gradual development or change over time.

may proceed

Uses "may" and "proceed" to indicate the possibility of continuing or moving forward with a process or action.

could potentially grow

Adds "potentially grow" to emphasize the likelihood of growth or expansion, while maintaining grammatical correctness.

might gradually improve

Combines "gradually improve" with "might" to express the possibility of a slow and steady enhancement.

FAQs

How do I properly use "could" to indicate advancement?

Use the base form of the verb after "could". For example, say "could "could progress"" instead of "could progresses".

What are some alternatives to the incorrect phrase "could progresses"?

Consider using phrases like "might advance", "can develop", or "could move forward" to express possibility and advancement correctly.

Is there a situation where "progresses" is correct after a modal verb?

No, modal verbs like "could", "should", "might", and "can" always require the base form of the verb. "Progresses" is a third-person singular present tense and does not fit grammatically after these modals.

What's the difference between "could progress" and "could progresses"?

"Could "could progress"" is grammatically correct and means there is a possibility of advancement. "Could progresses" is grammatically incorrect; the verb should be in its base form after "could".