The phrase "could not be committed" is grammatically correct and can be used in written English.
It is typically used when describing a situation where something was not able to be carried out or completed. For example: - The project could not be committed to because of budget constraints. - The crime could not be committed due to a lack of evidence. - The decision could not be committed to until all options were carefully considered.
Unlike hitting the Alt key, this misdeed could not be committed by accident, and the confession bore real consequences, since cheating violated the university's academic code.
Non-voters sent a clear signal to the government that further unlawful actions against their fellow citizens and, more importantly, ethnic minorities living in the border areas, could not be committed in their names.
Health Secretary Jeremy Hunt said changes had already been made but the NHS had to ensure that such offences could not be committed at hospitals again.
Further, the Court noted that, with the "high seas" crimes created by the Crimes Act of 1790 and Crimes Act of 1825, "the question presented in this case could not arise, as the offence could not be committed within the limits of the State".
Meanwhile, Hughes's fight to retain control of his businesses — to avoid being deemed insane — gets its own pseudo-romantic twist with his realization that, were he married, he couldn't be committed without his wife's approval.
"They couldn't commit to not being committed," Ms. Whitfield said.
A child rapist claimed he could not be civilly committed under the "serially violent predator" statute because, although he had many victims, he did not commit "forcible rape" and as such was not a "violent offender" under the statute.
"But crimes committed in the 1980s do not fall within the I.C.C. jurisdiction, so could not be used for crimes committed in the 1980s".
The following year, another law, Due Obedience, ruled that people could not be prosecuted for crimes committed while carrying out the orders of their superiors.
The Ninth Circuit, ruling in a case brought by four tenants who were facing eviction because of drug offenses by family members or, in one instance, an in-home caretaker, ruled that tenants could not be evicted for offenses committed by household members outside the apartment without proof that the tenant knew of the activity.
This came about when Britain's highest court, the Law Lords of the House of Lords, turned aside the general's claim that, under the principle of sovereign immunity, he could not be tried for acts committed while he was Chile's head of state, from 1973 to 1990.
