Used and loved by millions
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com
could kill both
Grammar usage guide and real-world examplesUSAGE SUMMARY
The phrase "could kill both" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used in contexts discussing potential harm or danger to two subjects or entities. Example: "The new virus strain is so potent that it could kill both humans and animals if not contained."
✓ Grammatically correct
News & Media
Alternative expressions(1)
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Human-verified examples from authoritative sources
Exact Expressions
3 human-written examples
Deer hunters, for example, could kill both a buck and a doe (New Mexico allowed only a buck).
News & Media
If no one ruined it for you, going in, it was very possible that Alfonso Cuarón could kill both Sandra Bullock and George Clooney and anybody else in space.
News & Media
Watering once a week could kill both.
News & Media
Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources
Similar Expressions
54 human-written examples
The man is named in a document passed by Mr Scaramella to Mr Litvinenko as the ringleader of a group which could be planning to kill both men.
News & Media
Some responded by counting out the ways in which Belcher could have killed both Perkins and himself without a gun — a morbid, reality-denying game.
News & Media
Some responded by counting out the ways in which Belcher could have killed both Perkins and himself without a gun a morbid, reality-denying game.
News & Media
Thankfully, that vulnerability works both ways, as Nikita demonstrated by daring her former mentor to detonate the bomb that could've killed both her and Cyrus.
News & Media
The surgery could kill or cripple one or both of them. 1 Judge Rejects Death Penalty A judge in a small, poor Ohio county told prosecutors they could not seek the death penalty in the murder of a college student because the county's share of the defense costs would be too great.
News & Media
You could kill somebody.
News & Media
Winters could kill people.
News & Media
It could kill them.
News & Media
Expert writing Tips
Best practice
When using the phrase "could kill both", ensure that the context clearly defines what 'both' refers to, to avoid ambiguity. For instance, specify "could kill both plants" or "could kill both candidates".
Common error
Avoid using "could kill both" in situations where the outcome is highly improbable. Reserve it for scenarios where a real and substantial threat exists.
Source & Trust
97%
Authority and reliability
4.1/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested
Linguistic Context
The phrase "could kill both" functions as a modal verb phrase expressing possibility and potential action. It indicates that there is a chance that something might cause the death of two entities.
Frequent in
News & Media
100%
Less common in
Formal & Business
0%
Science
0%
Academia
0%
Ludwig's WRAP-UP
The phrase "could kill both" is a modal verb phrase used to express the possibility of a lethal outcome affecting two entities. Ludwig AI indicates that the phrase is grammatically correct and can be used to warn, caution, or inform about potential dangers. Although the phrase is valid, its usage is relatively rare. Primarily found in news and media contexts, it carries a neutral register. To ensure clarity, remember to define what 'both' refers to when using this phrase.
More alternative expressions(10)
Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:
might eliminate both
Replaces "could kill" with "might eliminate", suggesting a possibility of removal rather than direct harm.
could cause the demise of both
Substitutes "kill" with "cause the demise of", a more formal and indirect way of expressing potential death.
could lead to the destruction of both
Replaces "kill" with "lead to the destruction of", focusing on the destructive outcome.
might result in both dying
Expresses the potential outcome more directly, using "dying" instead of "kill".
may be lethal to both
Uses "lethal" to indicate the potential for causing death, a more clinical term.
could be fatal for both
Replaces "kill" with "be fatal", highlighting the potential for death.
might bring about the end of both
A more dramatic and figurative way to express the potential for causing death.
could jeopardize both
Shifts the focus to endangering both, implying a risk of harm rather than certain death.
might endanger both
Suggests a possibility of putting both at risk, a less direct consequence than death.
could annihilate both
Replaces "kill" with "annihilate", implying complete destruction.
FAQs
How can I use "could kill both" in a sentence?
You can use "could kill both" to express a potential danger or destructive outcome affecting two entities. For instance, "The disease could kill both the host and any subsequent carriers".
What are some alternatives to "could kill both"?
Alternatives include "might eliminate both", "could cause the demise of both", or "may be lethal to both", depending on the nuance you wish to convey.
What does the phrase "could kill both" imply?
The phrase "could kill both" implies a situation where two specific entities face a potential threat that could result in their destruction or demise.
In what contexts is it appropriate to use "could kill both"?
It is appropriate to use "could kill both" in contexts where discussing risks, dangers, or potentially lethal situations affecting two specific subjects, such as in scientific discussions or news reports about specific threats.
Editing plus AI, all in one place.
Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Source & Trust
97%
Authority and reliability
4.1/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested