Used and loved by millions
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com
could have forgotten
Grammar usage guide and real-world examplesUSAGE SUMMARY
The phrase "could have forgotten" is correct and usable in written English.
It is typically used to express a possibility or speculation about someone forgetting something in the past. Example: "She could have forgotten to send the email, which is why we haven't received a response yet."
✓ Grammatically correct
News & Media
Science
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Human-verified examples from authoritative sources
Exact Expressions
30 human-written examples
I don't know how I could have forgotten.
News & Media
But really who, apart from Freddy's terrified and bewildered new victims, could have forgotten?
News & Media
I want to think she didn't – it seems impossible that I could have forgotten that.
News & Media
Our mother could have forgotten any of us, and one day she surely will.
News & Media
It's astonishing that any national leader could have forgotten what happened when Congress tried this before.
News & Media
Later, disbelieving that she could have forgotten the incident, Tan calls her mother to ask if it happened.
News & Media
Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources
Similar Expressions
30 human-written examples
Could she have forgotten — how could she have forgotten?
News & Media
How could I have forgotten?
News & Media
How could I have forgotten the kiss?
News & Media
How could I have forgotten all this?
News & Media
How could everyone have forgotten the stolen girl so soon?
News & Media
Expert writing Tips
Best practice
When using "could have forgotten", consider the context to ensure it accurately conveys the intended level of possibility and past action. Use it to express a plausible explanation for a past oversight or memory lapse.
Common error
Avoid using "could have forgotten" when you mean to express regret that something wasn't forgotten. "Should have forgotten" implies a desire that the forgetting had occurred, whereas "could have forgotten" simply suggests it was possible to forget.
Source & Trust
89%
Authority and reliability
4.5/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested
Linguistic Context
The phrase "could have forgotten" functions as a modal verb phrase expressing a possibility or speculation about a past event. The modal verb "could" indicates potential, while "have forgotten" refers to a completed action in the past. Ludwig AI confirms its usage in various contexts.
Frequent in
News & Media
60%
Science
28%
Formal & Business
12%
Less common in
Academia
0%
Encyclopedias
0%
Reference
0%
Ludwig's WRAP-UP
In summary, the phrase "could have forgotten" is a grammatically correct and commonly used modal verb phrase that expresses a possibility regarding a past memory lapse. As Ludwig AI confirms, it's versatile and fits well in news, scientific discussions, and general conversations. While offering plausible explanations, ensure to avoid confusion with similar phrases such as "should have forgotten", which conveys regret rather than possibility. Remember that while "could have forgotten" is common, there are many alternative phrases that can be used to achieve the same goal.
More alternative expressions(6)
Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:
might have forgotten
Expresses a similar level of possibility regarding forgetting, but with a slightly different modal verb.
might not have remembered
Similar in meaning but emphasizes the lack of remembering rather than the act of forgetting.
may have overlooked
Suggests a failure to notice something, implying a type of forgetting through inattention.
they may not have remembered
Similar to 'might not have remembered,' highlighting the uncertainty of recall.
perhaps overlooked
Similar to 'may have overlooked,' but with emphasis on possibility.
it's possible they forgot
Shifts the focus to the possibility of forgetting, using a more direct statement.
possibly neglected to remember
A more formal phrasing indicating a potential failure to recall something.
one might have overlooked
Suggests a failure to notice something, implying a type of forgetting through inattention. The subject of the action changes to 'one'.
conceivably did not recall
Emphasizes the potential lack of recollection, suggesting it's within the realm of possibility.
it's conceivable they didn't recall
Focuses on the conceivability of not recalling, rather than the direct action of forgetting.
FAQs
What does "could have forgotten" imply?
The phrase "could have forgotten" suggests a possibility that someone forgot something in the past. It indicates a plausible explanation for a memory lapse or oversight, rather than a certainty.
How can I use "could have forgotten" in a sentence?
You can use "could have forgotten" to express a potential reason for a past event. For example, "She "might have forgotten" her keys, which is why she was locked out".
What are some alternatives to "could have forgotten"?
Alternatives include "may have overlooked", "might not have remembered", or "it is possible they forgot", depending on the specific nuance you wish to convey.
What's the difference between "could have forgotten" and "should have forgotten"?
"Could have forgotten" expresses a possibility that someone forgot something, while "should have forgotten" expresses a regret that something wasn't forgotten. The first describes a potential memory lapse, while the second expresses a desire for amnesia.
Editing plus AI, all in one place.
Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Source & Trust
89%
Authority and reliability
4.5/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested