Sentence examples for costs of limiting from inspiring English sources

The costs of limiting migration are real.

Aggregations are generally considered as an evolutionary advantageous state in which members derive the benefits of mate choice and protection against natural enemies, balanced by the costs of limiting resources and intraspecific competition.

The presence of a weak evolutionary cost of resistance, but no costs of tolerance suggests that direct costs of limiting a pathogen burden may be more costly than dealing with the negative consequences of that burden.

Aggregations are generally considered as an evolutionary advantageous state in which members derive the benefits of protection and mate choice, balanced by the costs of limiting resources and competition.

Gradual cuts in emissions driven by targets but reached through market-based initiatives are the best way to cut the cost of limiting climate change.

Fox's efforts underscore how studios generally have been able to minimize their exposure at a time of blockbuster budgets — albeit at the cost of limiting their profit potential as well.

If the world does not widely use carbon capture and storage by the 2020s, the cost of limiting global temperatures would rise by $1.1 trillion, the International Energy Agency said last month in its annual outlook.

Economists trying to guess the ultimate cost of limiting carbon dioxide concentrations to 550 parts per million or below (the current level is 380ppm, 450ppm is reckoned to be ambitious and 550ppm liveable with) struggle with uncertainties too.

In a preview of tax showdowns to come, the fight pits the Democratic stance against a Republican refusal to raise taxes on one group as a way of cutting them for another or to offset the $50 billion cost of limiting the reach of the alternative minimum tax, since, the Republicans argue, it was never meant to collect so much revenue in the first place.

The rigorous exclusion increases the validity of our findings, but at the cost of limiting the sample size.

Dynamic and spatial efficiency can reduce the cost of limiting atmospheric concentrations of greenhouse gases by 50 80 percent.