Sentence examples for costs of alignment from inspiring English sources

Data File 2 (spreadsheets 2-5): RT costs of alignment for each condition for the composite face task.

Our data did reflect trends for reduced RT costs of alignment for incongruent faces for both the leftward- and rightward-shifting prism groups.

In the Results section, when discussing the results of the composite face task (page 5, 2 nd paragraph, right column) you note that, "the analyses revealed significant main effects of congruency for both leftward and rightward shifting prisms groups, reflecting lower RT costs of alignment for the incongruent faces than for the congruent faces".

The full data for the analysis are presented in Data File 2. The analyses revealed significant main effects of Congruency for both leftward-shifting [M=-6.5 vs M=16.1; F(1,28)=28.6, p<0.001] and rightward-shifting [M=0.15 vs M=14.1; F(1,29)=913.0, p<0.005] prism groups, reflecting lower RT costs of alignment for the incongruent faces than for the congruent faces.

The computational cost of alignment can be reduced by pre-aligning shapes, as is done with the Volumetric-Aligned Molecular Shapes (VAMS) method.

For each prism group (leftward- or rightward-prisms), repeated-measures ANOVAs were conducted on the RT cost of alignment; that is, the difference between RTs for aligned and misaligned faces.

Given the cost of aligning two nodes, the Hungarian algorithm locates the assignment of all pairs of nodes that yield a minimized total cost of alignment.

Overall, the results demonstrate that the RT cost of alignment became numerically smaller with time for both groups, consistent with a practice effect.

In contradiction of the experimental hypothesis, there was no significant change in RT cost of alignment for congruent or incongruent faces following adaptation to leftward-shifting prisms.

A significant Block Order x Block Number interaction for the leftward-shifting prism group [ F 1,27)=4.78, p<0.05] reflected trends in the RT cost of alignment depending on which face half the participants identified.

That is, there was a non-significant tendency towards a higher RT cost of alignment for block two for participants in the 'bottom half first' group, and for block one for the participants in the 'top half first' group (ps>0.05).