Used and loved by millions
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com
costs allocated for
Grammar usage guide and real-world examplesUSAGE SUMMARY
The phrase "costs allocated for" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing the distribution or assignment of costs to specific projects, departments, or activities. Example: "The costs allocated for the marketing campaign were significantly higher than anticipated."
✓ Grammatically correct
Science
Formal & Business
News & Media
Alternative expressions(20)
funds designated for
funds allocated to
funds earmarked for
funds allocated for
a sum for
a payment for
resources assigned to
a paramount for
costs dedicated
funds allocated
budgeted expenses
costs expended
budgetary provision for
money in the name of
payments made for
cheque in the name of
allocations into
investment in
funding for
budget assigned to
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Human-verified examples from authoritative sources
Exact Expressions
2 human-written examples
For the economic evaluation, the change in costs allocated for the prevention of falls and treatment of fall-related injuries between the pre-intervention and during intervention periods will be the numerator.
Science
Moreover, according to model projections, the greatest cost burden of pneumococcal disease was treatment of AOM, which accounts for 95% of direct medical costs allocated for the treatment of vaccine-preventable S. pneumoniae diseases or US$98.8 million under the PCV-7 strategy.
Science
Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources
Similar Expressions
58 human-written examples
If a capital good was purchased in the middle of this fiscal year and used only for half the year, the cost allocated for this item was half of the yearly cost.
Science
The $41.66 per individual represents $8.32 for malaria, $20.99 for diarrhea, and $12.35 for HIV, including general campaign costs allocated in proportion to disease-specific costs.
Science
Philadelphia has a percent for art program, which requires that a percentage of construction costs be allocated for art.
Wiki
The total treatment cost was allocated for purchase of chemical reagents.
Science
In addition, costs will be allocated for the beer serving equipment.
Science
Also, some claimed that the paying of 20USD to cover travel and time cost which was allocated for the enrolled volunteers was not enough.
Science
An American railroad does not know how much of its overhead costs to allocate, for example, to a shipment of coal from Cheyenne, Wyo., to Duluth, Minn.
Encyclopedias
Conversely, opportunity costs regarding human resources allocated for treatment supervision were not accounted for, thus underestimating DOT costs.
Science
At the same time, the cost allocated to the dialysis unit for sterilization of medical equipment seems to be high.
Science
Expert writing Tips
Best practice
When using "costs allocated for", ensure that the context clearly specifies what the costs are intended for. This improves clarity and avoids ambiguity.
Common error
Avoid using "costs allocated for" in contexts where a simpler phrasing like "funds for" or "budgeted for" would suffice. Simplicity enhances readability.
Source & Trust
82%
Authority and reliability
4.1/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested
Linguistic Context
The phrase "costs allocated for" functions as a prepositional phrase modifying a noun, typically describing how financial resources are designated or assigned. The phrase indicates a specific purpose or recipient of the funds. Ludwig confirms its grammatical correctness.
Frequent in
Science
45%
News & Media
25%
Formal & Business
15%
Less common in
Encyclopedias
5%
Wiki
5%
Reference
5%
Ludwig's WRAP-UP
In summary, the phrase "costs allocated for" is grammatically correct, albeit less common, used to describe the designated use of funds. According to Ludwig AI, the expression can be improved by using simpler and more direct expressions. While grammatically sound, consider alternatives like "funds designated for" or "budgeted for" for improved clarity and conciseness in most contexts. Predominantly found in scientific, business, and news contexts, the phrase aims for transparency in financial matters. Always ensure the intended purpose of the allocated costs is clear to avoid ambiguity.
More alternative expressions(10)
Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:
budgeted funds for
Replaces "costs" with "funds" and uses "budgeted" to emphasize the financial planning aspect.
funds designated for
Emphasizes the specific purpose for which the funds are intended.
expenses assigned to
Uses "expenses" instead of "costs" and "assigned to" to highlight the allocation process.
resources earmarked for
Replaces "costs" with "resources" to broaden the scope beyond just monetary expenses, also highlight the intention of the allocation.
financial provisions for
A more formal way of expressing the setting aside of funds for a specific purpose.
funds allocated to
A more direct and concise phrasing, replacing "for" with "to".
expenditures designated for
Similar to "funds designated for" but uses "expenditures" to focus on the spending aspect.
budget assigned for
Highlights the budgetary aspect of the allocation.
spending allocated to
Focuses on the "spending" and use "to" instead of "for".
provisions made for
Emphasizes the act of planning and preparing for the allocation of costs.
FAQs
How can I use "costs allocated for" in a sentence?
You can use "costs allocated for" when describing how a budget is divided for specific purposes, such as "The costs allocated for the marketing campaign were higher than expected".
What's a simpler alternative to "costs allocated for"?
Consider using alternatives like "funds designated for" or "budgeted funds for" if you want a more concise phrasing.
Is there a difference between "costs allocated for" and "costs allocated to"?
"Costs allocated to" is generally more direct and common. "Costs allocated for" emphasizes the purpose, but can sometimes sound less natural. Using "costs allocated to" is typically preferred for its conciseness.
When is it appropriate to use "costs allocated for" instead of "budgeted for"?
Use "costs allocated for" when you want to emphasize the specific expenses that have been set aside for a particular reason. "Budgeted for" is a broader term referring to overall financial planning, while "costs allocated for" is more about the distribution of those funds. Therefore, "budgeted for" is ideal for overall budgeting context.
Editing plus AI, all in one place.
Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Source & Trust
82%
Authority and reliability
4.1/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested