costed with

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "costed with" is not correct in standard written English.
The correct term is "costed" when referring to the process of estimating costs, but it is not typically used with "with." Example: "The project was costed at $10,000."

⚠ May contain grammatical issues

Science

News & Media

Formal & Business

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

10 human-written examples

Asked at a doorstop what portion of the alleged $66bn black hole was for actual Labor policies, Cormann said it consisted of $30bn of Labor's promises costed with their own numbers and "$35bn worth of savings that we have banked where Labor in one way or another has said you must restore that spending".

The Guardian

Labour says all its pledges are costed, with fundraising measures including a rise in income tax for higher earners, a corporation tax rise, a crackdown on tax avoidance and an "excessive pay levy" on salaries above £330,000.

BBC

All additional prescribed medication was costed with British National Formulary BNFF) prices.

British Medical Journal

5 Midstream urine analysis and antibiotic use were recorded and costed with methods described earlier.

British Medical Journal

The recruitment consultation was costed with national unit costs per minute based on the duration of consultation.

British Medical Journal

The scaling up nutrition country implementation plan is the multi-sectoral nutrition plan which is costed with a matrix of results to monitor the progress.

Unicef

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

50 human-written examples

And it costs, with dynamic scoring, less than a trillion dollars.

The Washington Post

(C ) Correlation of attributable cost with impact factor.

eLife

It costs $57 with traffic data included.

The New York Times - Tech

Profitability: Align cost reduction with sustainability.

Forbes

It cost $7,000 with interest.

Forbes

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When describing how costs were determined, use "costed using" or "calculated with" followed by the elements or methods employed. For instance, 'The project was costed using a detailed analysis of labor and materials'.

Common error

Avoid using "costed with" in formal reports or academic papers. It's better to say "the costs were calculated using" or "the project was costed at" for clarity and grammatical correctness.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "costed with" functions as a verb phrase attempting to describe the method by which something's cost was determined. However, as Ludwig AI points out, this is not standard English. It's an attempt to connect the act of costing to the elements included in that calculation.

Expression frequency: Uncommon

Frequent in

Science

40%

News & Media

38%

Formal & Business

22%

Less common in

Wiki

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "costed with" attempts to link the action of costing to the factors included in that cost determination. However, Ludwig AI identifies this as grammatically incorrect in standard English, a conclusion supported by its infrequent and questionable use in writing. While examples exist across various domains like science, news, and business, it's advisable to use alternatives such as "costed using", "calculated with", or "priced at" to ensure clarity and correctness. Therefore, opting for these alternatives not only enhances grammatical precision but also reinforces a professional tone in your writing.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

costed using

Replaces 'with' with 'using', which can sometimes fit the intended meaning but might still sound awkward.

priced using

Uses 'priced' instead of 'costed', and 'using' instead of 'with', to describe how the pricing was determined.

estimated using

Uses 'estimated' instead of 'costed', and 'using' instead of 'with', focusing on the estimation process.

calculated with

Uses "calculated with" which refers to making a calculation that includes a certain element.

valued with

Replaces 'costed' with 'valued' and retains 'with', suitable when assigning a value rather than a cost.

priced in

Uses "priced in" which refers to the inclusion of something in a calculation.

factored into the cost

Replaces "costed with" with a more descriptive phrase indicating that something was considered when determining the cost.

included in the costing

Restructures the phrase to emphasize that certain elements are part of the costing process.

the cost reflects

Emphasizes what the cost accounts for, instead of detailing how it was costed.

costed at

Uses "costed at" which indicates the final estimated cost of something.

FAQs

How can I rephrase "costed with" to sound more professional?

Use phrases like "costed using", "calculated with", or "priced at" depending on the context to ensure grammatical correctness and clarity.

Is "costed with" grammatically correct?

According to Ludwig AI, "costed with" is not correct in standard written English. It's advisable to use alternative phrasing such as "estimated using" or "priced in" to maintain grammatical accuracy.

What's a common mistake when trying to express how a cost was determined?

A common mistake is using the phrase "costed with". A more accurate way to express this is by saying "the cost reflects" or specifying that the cost was "factored into the cost".

What does it mean to say something is "costed at"?

Saying something is "costed at" indicates the final estimated cost of something. It's a way of stating the total expected expenses, like saying, "The project was costed at $1 million."