Sentence examples for cost rebate from inspiring English sources

New Mexico officials boast of having used a 25percentt production cost rebate to build a local film industry that has attracted more than $600 million in direct spending since 2003, and an estimated $1.8 billion in total financial impact, as of last June.

Due to its high efficiency and clean emissions, a variety of capital cost rebate programs are making the biofuel DFCs economical and competitive with natural gas internal combustion engines and micro-turbines [3], particularly in regions that require downstream emission cleanup of internal combustion power generation.

Unit costs will be derived from data obtained from Medicare Australia regarding Medicare Benefits Schedule (MBS) and Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme (PBS) claims (i.e., net cost, rebate, gap payment) for each participant for the study duration, and from Australian Refined Diagnosis Related Groups (AR-DRG) cost weights [ 21].

For that reason they arrange subsidies in the form of tax abatements, cost rebates, taxpayer-funded infrastructure improvements, low-interest loans, and other valuable consideration.

A court in the EU would likely be less reluctant to find above-cost rebates anticompetitive than its U.S. counterparts.

A case may not need to be as unique as Post Danmark II, though, for above-cost rebates to be anticompetitive.

If courts view above-cost rebates as potentially capable of foreclosing competition, the meaning of capability as it relates to likelihood becomes more important.

Even in the United States, some commentators, including FTC commissioner Joshua Wright, have argued that allowing all above-cost rebates ignores economic evidence that rebates priced above cost can foreclose equally efficient competitors.

If above-cost rebates can be anticompetitive (as the ECJ found in Post Danmark II), the question of how likely anticompetitive foreclosure must be in order for the rebates to be "capable" of foreclosing competition becomes more important.

Given the more aggressive stance of the EU towards dominant firm abuses and the absence of the private plaintiff problem, EU courts will likely be more willing to consider circumstances under which even above-cost rebates could harm competition.

Whether this clarification will give firms confidence in adopting rebates as procompetitive pricing strategies depends on how courts perform the capability analysis, including whether and under what circumstances above-cost rebates can be anticompetitive, and how likely the anticompetitive foreclosure must be.