cost funds

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "cost funds" is not correct and does not convey a clear meaning in written English.
It may be intended to refer to the funds required for a specific cost or expense, but it lacks clarity and proper context. Example: "The project will require additional cost funds to cover unexpected expenses."

⚠ May contain grammatical issues

News & Media

Academia

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

14 human-written examples

Homeownership programs that provide assistance with down payment and closing cost funds can be found at Downpaymentresource.com.com

The Washington Post

No additional administrative cost funds shall be provided under this chapter to pay for administrative costs relating to the instruction of the students.

Cornell University

9) Switch to lower cost funds.

Forbes

Cheap index funds dominate the list of low cost funds.

Forbes

The tax breaks can still outweigh the advantage of lower cost funds in a taxable account.

Forbes

Typically, banks want to fund themselves with the lowest cost funds possible.

Forbes

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

46 human-written examples

(There are other parts of the USF which include High-cost funds, and other funded areas).

Huffington Post

"In every single time period and data point tested, low-cost funds beat high-cost funds," Mr. Kinnel said in the article.

The New York Times

broke the stock fund universe into the nine categories and found that in eight of the nine, low-cost funds beat high-cost funds in annual returns.

The New York Times

Slowly but steadily this will expand the market for low-cost funds.

The Economist

In other words, the holdings of investors are more concentrated in low-cost funds.

The New York Times

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Instead of using the phrase "cost funds", use more precise terms such as "funding for costs", "financial resources for expenses", or "budget allocation". This ensures clarity and avoids potential misinterpretations.

Common error

Avoid using "cost funds" in formal writing. It is not a standard expression and can be confusing. Instead, choose clear and direct alternatives like "funds for expenses" to ensure your message is easily understood.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "cost funds" is intended to function as a noun phrase, but it's grammatically incorrect. Ludwig AI indicates that the phrase is not standard English and lacks clarity, meaning it doesn't effectively fulfill a clear grammatical function.

Expression frequency: Rare

Frequent in

News & Media

50%

Academia

50%

Formal & Business

0%

Less common in

Science

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "cost funds" is grammatically incorrect and not recommended for use in standard English. According to Ludwig AI, it lacks clarity and does not effectively convey its intended meaning. Instead, it's best to use alternative phrases such as "funding for costs", "financial resources for expenses", or "budget allocation" to ensure clarity and accuracy. The phrase appears rarely, primarily in News & Media and Academic contexts, but its incorrectness undermines its suitability for professional or formal settings.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

funding for costs

Rephrases the concept to emphasize the allocation of funds specifically designated to cover costs.

financial resources for expenses

Emphasizes the financial resources available to cover expenses.

budget allocations for expenditures

Focuses on budget allocations designated for covering expenditures.

expense coverage funds

Inverts the structure to highlight funds that provide coverage for expenses.

monetary provisions for overhead

Specifies monetary provisions intended for overhead costs.

capital designated for outlays

Highlights capital resources specifically designated for outlays.

resources to cover costs

Focuses on the resources available with the purpose to cover the costs.

financial backing for costs

It replaces funds with backing and conveys a similar meaning.

funds allocated to cover costs

It emphasizes the act of allocation of the funds to cover costs.

funds for cost coverage

It changes the structure of the phrase while keeping the focus on cost coverage.

FAQs

What does "cost funds" mean?

The phrase "cost funds" is grammatically incorrect and lacks a clear meaning. It's better to use phrases like "funding for costs" or "financial resources for expenses" to convey the intended meaning.

Is "cost funds" grammatically correct?

No, "cost funds" is not grammatically correct in standard English. It's more appropriate to use terms like "funds to cover costs" or "budget allocations for expenditures".

How can I use "funds" in a sentence about covering expenses?

You can say "We need "expense coverage funds" for the project" or "The budget includes funds allocated for operational costs".

What are some alternatives to "cost funds" in a budget report?

In a budget report, use alternatives such as "monetary provisions for overhead", "capital designated for outlays", or "resources to cover costs" to clearly indicate how funds are allocated.