cost for both

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "cost for both" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing expenses that apply to two parties or items. Example: "The total cost for both the dinner and the movie was surprisingly affordable."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

News & Media

Formal & Business

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

54 human-written examples

Cost for both: 40 euros.

The New York Times - Travel

"It substantially reduced the transactional cost for both us and the customer," Mr. Hastings said.

The New York Times

Cost for both events was $750 a person; for the tasting alone, $300.

The New York Times - Style

"It carries enormous cost for both the people facing destitution and society as a whole," she said.

The Guardian

But they came at a cost, for both the companies' pocketbooks, and, therefore, for their 2001 results and their 2002 sales.

The New York Times

And here are a few more facts to put the voracious war machine in context: By year's end, the cost for both conflicts since Sept. 11, 2001, is projected to reach more than $800 billion.

The New York Times

Mr. Kohler, who also sells retractable awnings, said that the cost for both types is about the same -- about $2,500 for a 16-by-10-foot 16-by-10-foot 16-by-10-foot 16-by-10-foot

The New York Times

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

4 human-written examples

Australia will cover all costs for both countries.

The Guardian

This early intervention saved substantial costs for both the DWP and the Tribunals Service.

The Guardian

Cities thrive because the benefits of agglomeration outweigh the costs, for both companies and consumers.

The New Yorker

The decision to run again was not without costs for both.

The New York Times

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When discussing expenses, clarify what "both" refers to, whether it's two entities, items, or time periods. For example: "The cost for both the materials and the labor was higher than expected."

Common error

Avoid ambiguity by ensuring the reader clearly understands what "both" refers to. Vague references can lead to confusion. For example: "The cost for both was high" lacks clarity without context.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "cost for both" functions primarily as a noun phrase, often serving as the subject or object of a sentence. It describes an amount of money required for two identified entities. Ludwig AI indicates that the phrase is grammatically sound and widely used.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

Science

46%

News & Media

31%

Formal & Business

9%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

2%

Wiki

2%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "cost for both" is a grammatically correct and commonly used way to express the expense associated with two distinct entities or scenarios. Ludwig AI confirms its validity and broad applicability. It is particularly frequent in scientific and news-related contexts, and its use implies a need to clarify what "both" refers to in order to avoid ambiguity. Alternative phrases include "price for both" and "expense for both". Ensuring clarity and context will enhance the effectiveness of this phrase in your writing.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

price for both

A more direct synonym focusing on the monetary value for two parties.

expense for both

Similar to 'cost', but can imply a less direct or anticipated expenditure.

prices for both

Plural form emphasizing multiple prices for two entities.

pricing for both

Emphasizes the price setting aspect affecting two entities.

expenditure for both

A more formal alternative to expense.

outlay for both

Highlights the expenditure aspect affecting two parties.

costly for both

Adjective form indicating something is expensive for two parties.

affordability for both

Focuses on whether something is within financial reach for two parties.

amount for both

Highlights the total sum applicable to two parties.

burden for both

Shifts the focus to the negative impact or difficulty for two entities.

FAQs

How can I use "cost for both" in a sentence?

Use "cost for both" when you want to express the price, expense, or outlay that applies to two distinct items, entities, or scenarios. For instance, "The cost for both the software and the training was $500".

What phrases can I use instead of "cost for both"?

Alternatives include "price for both", "expense for both", or "outlay for both", depending on the specific nuance you want to convey.

Is it better to use "cost for both" or "costs for both"?

Use "cost for both" when referring to a general expense. "Costs for both" may be suitable when referring to individual or itemized expenses that apply to two distinct things.

What is implied when using the phrase "cost for both"?

It implies that there are two distinct entities, items, or scenarios being considered, and the expense or price is applicable to each of them.