Sentence examples for cost effective was from inspiring English sources

The ICER for all other strategies ranged from £49 928 to £272 463 per QALY versus routine care only, while the probability that no formal identification strategy was cost effective was 88%5959%) at a cost effectiveness threshold of £20 000 (£30 000) per QALY.

As we do not know the threshold willingness to pay value for additional effectiveness associated with CBT, the probability that CBT will be considered cost effective was calculated for a range of threshold values and presented in a cost effectiveness acceptability curve (CEAC).

The probability that a treatment option would be cost effective was plotted against the Y-axis and the threshold cost effectiveness (the amount of money that one is willing to spend to gain one year of life) on the X-axis.

If the threshold of cost-effectiveness analysis is JPY 6.0 million (€55 000) per QALY gained, the probability that trastuzumab is cost effective was 14.7% for all HER2-positive populations, 23.4% for the IHC 2+/FISH+ or IHC 3+ population, and 47.9% for the IHC 3+ population.

The aqueous extract of Hibiscus sabdariffa L., which is inherently non-toxic, environmentally friendly and cost effective, was used as a green reducing agent to chemically reduce graphene oxide (GO).

At a willingness to pay threshold of £30 000 the probability of screening being cost effective was less than 30%.

The likelihood that adding a genetic test to the usual smoking-cessation intervention is cost-effective was 20.6% however cost-effectiveness ratios were favourable in certain situations (e.g., applied to men only, a 60 year old cohort).

The probability of the intervention being cost-effective was explored through the use of cost-effectiveness acceptability curve (CEAC), which were created by calculating a series of net benefits for a range (£0 £60,000) of plausible values defined as a decision maker's willingness to pay for an additional unit improvement of health outcomes (e.g. QALYs) [28].

Results were plotted on a graph of 'bundle cost' against 'bundle effectiveness', and the maximum cost at which the bundle remained cost-effective was identified for each level of effectiveness.

The probability of the interventions being considered cost-effective was expressed as the probability of the incremental cost-effectiveness ratios being less than the 2011 Gross National Income (GNI) per capita in Zambia of US$ 1,160 [ 19].

Figure  3 also presents a cost-effectiveness acceptability curve, in which the probability of the intervention being cost-effective was estimated at different thresholds values of cost per QALY.